State v. Isaacson
| Decision Date | 18 May 1923 |
| Docket Number | No. 23083.,23083. |
| Citation | 193 N.W. 694,155 Minn. 377 |
| Parties | STATE v. ISAACSON. |
| Court | Minnesota Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from District Court, Brown County; I. M. Olson, Judge.
A. Isaacson, also known as A. Saxon, was convicted of selling mortgaged personal property without the consent of the mortgagee, and he appeals. Reversed.
An indictment for selling mortgaged personal property without the consent of the mortgagee, which fails to show that an unpaid debt secured by the mortgage existed at the time of the sale, is fatally defective. Morphy, Bradford, Cummins and G. C. Axelrod, all of St. Paul, for appellant.
C. L. Hilton, Atty. Gen., Jas. E. Markham, Asst. Atty. Gen., and W. T. Eckstein, Co. Atty., of New Ulm, for the State.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of selling mortgaged personal property without the consent of the mortgagee, and appeals from an order denying a new trial.
The defendant contends that the facts stated in the indictment do not constitute a criminal offense.
The indictment contains allegations to the effect that defendant mortgaged a Chevrolet automobile, described therein, to the Mounds Park State Bank, that the bank assigned the mortgage to Herbert A. Gerber, and then charges that defendant did--
‘willfully, wrongfully and unlawfully sell and convey said personal property as mortgaged as hereinbefore set forth to one Alfred Baltrusch without the written consent of said Mounds Park State Bank, the said mortgagee, or the written consent of the said Herbert A. Gerber, the said assignee of the said mortgagee described as aforesaid, and without informing the said Alfred Baltrusch aforesaid that the said personal property so sold and conveyed to him, the said Alfred Baltrusch, that it was mortgaged and the true amount then due on the debt secured by said mortgage aforesaid.’
The statute reads:
‘Every person, who, with intent to place mortgaged personal property beyond the reach of the mortgagee or his assigns, shall remove or conceal, or aid or abet in removing or concealing, any such property, and any mortgagor of such property who shall assent to or knowingly suffer such removal or concealment, or, at any time before the debt secured by a chattel mortgage has been fully paid, shall sell, convey, or in any manner dispose of the personal property so mortgaged, or any part thereof, without the written consent of the mortgagee or his assigns, or without informing the person to whom he shall sell, convey, or dispose of the same that it is mortgaged, and the true amount then due on the debt secured by such mortgage, shall be punished by imprisonment in the State prison or county jail for not more than one year, or by fine of not more than five hundred dollars.’ G. S. 1913, § 8907.
The objection that the indictment charged two offenses and was bad for duplicity was waived by failing to demur to it on that ground. State v. Henn, 39 Minn. 464, 40 N. W. 564;State v. Briggs, 84 Minn. 357, 87 N. W. 935;State v. Kunz, 90 Minn. 526, 97 N. W. 131.
The objection urged against the indictment at the trial and here is that it nowhere states that the debt secured by the chattel mortgage had not been fully paid before the sale of the mortgaged property. The offense defined by the provision of the statute under which this indictment is drawn consists in...
To continue reading
Request your trial