State v. Ivory, ED 96414.
| Decision Date | 23 October 2012 |
| Docket Number | No. ED 96414.,ED 96414. |
| Citation | 383 S.W.3d 21 |
| Parties | STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Christopher J. IVORY, Defendant/Appellant. |
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, 0922–CR04781–01, John J. Riley, Judge.
Edward Scott Thompson, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.
Chris Koster, Attorney General, Mary Highland Moore, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.
Christopher J. Ivory appeals from the judgment upon his conviction by a jury for one count of attempted forcible rape, in violation of Section 566.030, RSMo 20001, one count of kidnapping, in violation of Section 565.110, and one count of stealing from a person, in violation of Section 570.030. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
1. Unless otherwise indicated, all further references are to RSMo 2000.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ivory v. State
...question, and argue Movant's decision to self-represent. This Court affirmed Movant's conviction on direct appeal. State v. Ivory, 383 S.W.3d 21 (Mo.App.E.D.2012). Movant subsequently filed his PCR Motion alleging that his appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance by failing to rais......
- Maurer v. Maurer