State v. Jacinto
| Decision Date | 16 July 2020 |
| Docket Number | No. 108944,108944 |
| Citation | 2020 Ohio 3722,155 N.E.3d 1056 |
| Parties | STATE of Ohio, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kainoa JACINTO, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | Ohio Court of Appeals |
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant Kainoa Jacinto appeals his conviction for felonious assault following a jury trial. Jacinto contends that the trial court erred in failing to give the jury a self-defense instruction, in admitting evidence of a 911 call from a caller who did not testify and in admitting "expert" opinion testimony from a paramedic that had not been disclosed in a written expert report and that exceeded the scope of his expertise. Jacinto further contends that his conviction is not supported by sufficient evidence and is against the manifest weight of the evidence and that his four-year prison sentence is not supported by the record. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court's decision.
{¶ 2} On October 9, 2018, a Cuyahoga County Grand Jury indicted Jacinto on one count of felonious assault in violation of R.C. 2903.11(A)(1), a second-degree felony. The charge arose out of September 16, 2018 incident in which Jacinto punched and "knocked out" Bryant Lee ("Lee"), who struck his head on the concrete sidewalk as he fell to the ground. As a result of the incident, Lee sustained a serious brain injury. Jacinto pled not guilty and, on July 24, 2019, a jury trial commenced. A summary of the relevant evidence presented at trial follows.
{¶ 3} On September 15, 2018, Jacinto and Lee were in Cleveland, attending a conference for a company for which they both worked, ACN, Inc. ("ACN"), a "one-stop shop" for services such as gas and electric utility services, high speed internet, home security services and identity theft protection. Jacinto traveled to Cleveland from Michigan for the conference, and Lee and his wife, Jaime Lee ("Jaime"), traveled to Cleveland from Wisconsin for the conference. Jacinto and the Lees were staying at the Hilton Garden Inn on Carnegie Avenue in Cleveland.
{¶ 4} The Lees and Jacinto met for the first time that evening at the hotel bar. Around midnight, Jacinto, the Lees and several other ACN conference attendees decided to leave the hotel bar and go to other downtown bars. Along the way, they bumped into another ACN conference attendee, Orlando Contreras, who was also staying at the Hilton Garden Inn. Contreras had never met Jacinto or the Lees prior to the conference.
{¶ 5} Jaime described Jacinto as "obnoxious," "loud" and "cocky." She stated that he talked about being a mixed martial arts ("MMA") fighter, bragged about his houses, cars and how much money he had made and was "poking at everybody and kind of flaunting * * * the entire night." Jaime stated that she talked and laughed with the other ACN conference attendees and "played the role" because she knew her husband wanted to "climb the ladder of the team in this organization." She testified that Lee and Jacinto talked a lot and seemed to be getting along very well.
{¶ 6} Contreras testified that Jacinto carried himself as being "someone of importance" and that Jacinto told him that he was "a fighter" and that he "trained semi-pro MMA." Because Contreras also spent a lot of the time in the gym and had fought some men with professional training, the two men discussed their past experiences and training history. Jacinto told Contreras that he had been "known to beat several people up in a single incident if needed."
{¶ 7} Contreras testified that "everyone got along well" that night with "lots of laughs, jokes, situations" and that everyone was drinking heavily. At around 2:00 a.m., the group headed back to the hotel.
{¶ 8} Jaime testified that once they arrived back at the hotel, Jacinto made a "slick," "annoying" comment to her that made her "very angry." Jaime told Jacinto that she was "not one to mess with" and her husband suggested that she go to bed. Jamie took her husband's advice and went back to their hotel room.
{¶ 9} Contreras testified that as they were walking back to the hotel, Jacinto told Contreras he could have "hooked him up" with a girl at the bar but that his "dance moves" "f***** it up." Contreras said he did not react to Jacinto's comment, but that Lee intervened and told Jacinto he had been "rude" and "disrespectful" and owed Contreras an apology. Contreras stated that Lee was "trying to prove a point" to Jacinto, i.e., that "you can't be rude to people," but that Jacinto "wouldn't accept it" and said he had done nothing wrong. The two men went back and forth about the issue for several minutes.
{¶ 10} Contreras testified that, during this time, Jacinto told him he was "trying not to get mad" and was "antsy," "pacing back and forth," "[l]ike he had to like basically walk it off." After a bit, the situation deescalated. Jacinto and Lee shook hands and appeared to be "cool," and the three men began walking back toward the hotel.
{¶ 11} Before the three men went back into the hotel, however, the situation re-escalated. According to Contreras, "somebody said something and then it started right back up again * * * just about the same thing." The two men got "real close to each other," "chest to chest," and Lee poked Jacinto in the chest "like three times," "saying something."
{¶ 12} Contreras testified that, by this time, all three men were "pretty intoxicated." In addition to whatever else the men had had to drink earlier that evening, Contreras stated that the men had gone to three or four bars, were "taking turns" buying rounds and all had had "one shot, one drink at each location, [with] probably an extra drink at the last location."
{¶ 13} After the "poking," the situation calmed down again for a bit. Contreras testified that after Lee poked Jacinto, Jacinto turned around and walked away, trying to "walk it off" as Lee kept talking, lecturing Jacinto about his disrespectful conduct.
{¶ 14} At some point during their interaction, Jaime came out of the hotel and told Lee it was "time to go to bed." Jaime testified that Lee had his hands in his pockets, that the three men laughed at her remark and that it "seemed like everything was fine." "[S]ens[ing] nothing being wrong," Jaime went back to her hotel room, took a shower and went to bed. Lee remained outside with Jacinto and Contreras. The next time Jaime saw Lee was in the intensive care unit at a nearby hospital.
{¶ 15} In the last four minutes of their interaction, the situation re-escalated once again. Jacinto was about to enter the hotel, but suddenly turned back. Contreras stated that, at this point, Lee said something "petty" to Jacinto and Jacinto "just couldn't take it anymore," his eyes were locked on Lee, he was "clearly mad" and Contreras could tell he was "ready to fight," i.e., that he had "hit that switch" and was in "attack mode."
{¶ 16} Contreras testified that as Jacinto started moving towards Lee, he got in between the two men and, for approximately three or four minutes, held Jacinto back from Lee, stepping in front of Jacinto, blocking him and "pressing him away" from Lee, who was "standing still" but "kept talking." At the time, Lee and Jacinto were "like three to four feet [apart,] just outside striking distance."
{¶ 17} Contreras testified that, eventually, Lee said, and assumed a "fighting stance." Deciding there was "nothing more [he] could do about it" and that the two men were "clearly going to fight," Contreras dropped his hands, turned around and walked back towards the hotel entrance. At this time, Lee and Jacinto were approximately eight feet apart. Contreras stated that he was "trying not to see anything" and was "just trying to go to the door," but that he heard "a very brief fight," i.e., "scruffles." Four or five seconds later, Jacinto was "walking up right by [his] side" and they walked into the hotel together. Contreras testified that he felt "terrified" as he rode the elevator with Jacinto because he "did not want to be involved" and "did not want to get assaulted" himself.
{¶ 18} Contreras stated that although Lee may have "verbally initiated" the fight by "arguing" with Jacinto, "trying to make things right," Lee never pushed or punched Jacinto. According to Contreras, although it was an "emotional conversation" between Lee and Jacinto in which Lee "yelled" and "raised his voice," Lee never threated Jacinto and never said anything "derogatory" or used "fighting words"; he "just took it too far" trying to make a point. Contreras testified that the "fight" occurred approximately ten minutes after Lee "poked" Jacinto in the chest.
{¶ 19} Surveillance footage from the hotel's security cameras captured portions of the interaction between the three men until the last four or five minutes leading up to the "fight." The surveillance video has no audio but shows Jacinto with his hand on the door to the hotel lobby, opening the door at approximately 3:15:40.1 He closes the door and turns back to shake hands with Contreras. Jacinto and Lee shake hands and Lee pulls Jacinto towards him in a hug at approximately 3:15:54. Jacinto then moves towards Lee, talking and gesturing with his right hand in close proximity to Lee. It cannot be seen from the video whether Jacinto makes contact with Lee when gesturing. As the two men continue talking, Lee moves toward Jacinto and gestures and points his index finger at Jacinto, ultimately touching or poking Jacinto in the chest with his fingers at 3:16:14. The two men continue talking. Jacinto backs away at first, then, once again, moves closer towards Lee, gesturing with his right hand as he talks. Then Lee moves towards Jacinto, pointing his finger and gesturing at Lee. Both men continue gesturing with their hands and talking in close proximity to one another.
{¶ 20} At approximately 3:16:53, Contreras steps in, places his hand on Jacinto's shoulder and proceeds to...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Washington
...arguments to support a defendant's assignment of error and '"will not "guess at undeveloped claims on appeal.'"' State v. Jacinto, 2020-Ohio-3722, 155 N.E.3d 1056, ¶ 56 (8th Dist.), quoting State v. 2020-Ohio-1177, 153 N.E.3d 573, ¶ 39 (9th Dist.), quoting McPherson v. Goodyear Tire & Rubbe......
-
State v. Williams
...arguments to support a defendant's assignment of error and '"will not "guess at undeveloped claims on appeal.'"' State v. Jacinto, 2020-Ohio-3722, 155 N.E.3d 1056, ¶ 56 (8th Dist.), quoting State v. 2020-Ohio-1177, 153 N.E.3d 573, ¶ 39 (9th Dist.), quoting McPherson v. Goodyear Tire & Rubbe......
-
State v. Walker
...the burden of disproving self-defense if appropriately raised, but that burden is limited to disproving any one element. Jacinto, 2020-Ohio-3722, 155 N.E.3d 1056, at 46 (8th Dist); State v. Smith, 1st Dist. Hamilton No. C-190507, 2020-Ohio-4976, ¶ 49-50. In light of the burden shifting to t......
-
State v. Grant
... ... jury instruction on the defense of self-defense under R.C ... 2901.05 * * *, where the evidence in the record is sufficient ... to raise a question of reasonable doubt of guilt, based on a ... claim of self-defense, in the mind of a reasonable ... juror." State v. Jacinto , 8th Dist., ... 2020-Ohio-3722, 155 N.E.3d 1056, ¶ 49 ... Estelle at ¶ 18. "The reference in R.C ... 2901.05(B)(1) to 'evidence presented that tends to ... support' self-defense indicates that the defendant's ... burden of production is not a heavy one and that it might ... even be ... ...