State v. Jackson
Decision Date | 13 October 1971 |
Docket Number | No. 16,16 |
Citation | 279 N.C. 503,183 S.E.2d 550 |
Parties | STATE of North Carolina v. Vernell 'Bunk' JACKSON. |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Atty. Gen. Robert Morgan and Staff Atty. James L. Blackburn, Raleigh, for the State.
W. Harrell Everett, Jr., Goldsboro, for defendant.
There was plenary evidence to support the trial judge's findings that defendant freely, understandingly and voluntarily entered his plea of guilty of second degree murder, and the acceptence of the plea will not be disturbed. State v. Jones, 278 N.C. 259, 179 S.E.2d 433; State v. Caldwell, 269 N.C. 521, 153 S.E.2d 34. Further, the record contains no assignments of error, but the appeal itself is an exception to the judgment. The case is therefore presented for review only for errors appearing on the face of the record. State v. Higgs, 270 N.C. 111, 153 S.E.2d 781; State v. Elliott, 269 N.C. 683, 153 S.E.2d 330.
The indictment sufficiently charged the crime to which defendant voluntarily pleaded in a properly organized court, and the sentence was within statutory limits.
We have carefully examined this record and find
No Error.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Hudson, 15
...face of the record proper, the judgment will be sustained. State v. Williams, 268 N.C. 295, 150 S.E.2d 447 (1966); State v. Jackson, 279 N.C. 503, 183 S.E.2d 550 (1971). An examination of the record proper reveals no error. State v. Tinsley, 279 N.C. 482, 183 S.E.2d 669 Consideration of the......
-
State v. Hooker
...“[W]here a guilty plea was freely, voluntarily and understandingly made, the plea should not be disturbed.” State v. Jackson, 279 N.C. 503, 504, 183 S.E.2d 550, 551 (1971).Here, the record supports the adjudication that the Defendant's guilty plea was freely, understandingly, and voluntaril......
-
State v. Wilson, No. COA07-144 (N.C. App. 9/4/2007)
...was fully, knowingly, and voluntarily entered, the acceptance of the plea will not be disturbed on appeal. See State v. Jackson, 279 N.C. 503, 504, 183 S.E.2d 550, 551 (1971). Accordingly, we overrule defendant's Defendant has failed to argue assignment of error number 1 in the record on ap......
-
State v. Green
...is an exception to the judgment and presents the case for review only for errors appearing on the face of the record. State v. Jackson, 279 N.C. 503, 183 S.E.2d 550 (1971); 3 Strong, N.C. Index 2d, Criminal Law § 161. The indictment in this case, proper in form, charged defendant with burgl......