State v. Jackson

Decision Date20 September 1989
Docket NumberNo. 23151,23151
Citation301 S.C. 49,389 S.E.2d 654
CourtSouth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesThe STATE, Respondent, v. Curtis JACKSON, Appellant. . Heard

Thomas A. Bound and Wayne Floyd, West Columbia, for appellant.

Atty. Gen. T. Travis Medlock, Asst. Attys. Gen. Harold M. Coombs, Jr., and Norman Mark Rapoport, Columbia, and Sol. Donald V. Myers, Lexington, for respondent.

TOAL, Justice:

On December 10, 1987, Curtis Jackson was tried in his absence and convicted of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute and resisting arrest. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

Jackson contends that the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury that his absence could not be used as an inference of guilt against him. We agree.

When a defendant is tried in absentia, the trial court should instruct the jury that the defendant's failure to appear may not be construed as an admission of guilt. We hereby overrule State v. Johnson, 213 S.C. 241, 49 S.E.2d 6 (1948), to the extent that it is inconsistent with this opinion.

Having reversed the lower court on this issue, we need not address Jackson's remaining exception.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

GREGORY, C.J., and HARWELL, CHANDLER and FINNEY, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Tedder v. Dixie Lawn Serv.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Court of Appeals
    • May 22, 2007
    ... ... Hilton Head, II, Inc., 371 ... S.C. 340, 352, 638 S.E.2d 96, 102 (Ct. App. 2006) (petition ... for certiorari pending) (citing State v. Condrey, ... 349 S.C. 184, 195-96, 562 S.E.2d 320, 325 (Ct. App. 2002)) ... The trial court's rulings regarding content of a closing ... ...
  • McFadden v. State, 25206.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • October 30, 2000
    ...to Petitioner's failure to present a defense? 2. Was Petitioner's counsel ineffective in failing to request a jury charge pursuant to State v. Jackson, and in failing to object to solicitor's closing argument that Petitioner's absence from trial was evidence of his LAW/ANALYSIS I. Failure t......
  • State v. Johnson
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • May 18, 1994
    ... ... 213 S.C. 241, 246, 49 S.E.2d 6, 8 (1948), overruled on other grounds, State v. Jackson, 301 S.C. 49, 389 ... S.E.2d 654 (1990). Accordingly, the trial judge did not err in refusing Johnson's request to charge the jury with a definition of "reasonable doubt." See State v. McMahon, 158 Vt. 640, 603 A.2d 1128 (1992) (court did not err in declining to offer a definition of ... ...
  • Burgess v. State, 5091.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Court of Appeals
    • February 20, 2013
    ...draw conclusions from the fact that he did not testify. However, the circuit court did not explicitly inform the jury that, pursuant to State v. Jackson,1 they could not construe Burgess's absence as an admission of guilt. Burgess's trial counsel did not objector request any additional char......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT