State v. Jadwin
Decision Date | 02 December 1904 |
Citation | 85 S.W. 490 |
Parties | STATE v. JADWIN et al.<SMALL><SUP>*</SUP></SMALL> |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Galveston County; Robt. G. Street, Judge.
Action by the state against Edgar Jadwin and others. From a judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiff appeals. Reversed.
C. K. Bell, Atty. Gen., and Masterson & Masterson, for the State. M. C. McLemore, for appellees.
In this suit the state of Texas seeks to recover of Edgar Jadwin and his codefendants the possession of certain lands on the east end of Galveston Island, alleged to have been occupied by it as a site for a quarantine station until unlawfully dispossessed by defendants. The defendants answered, setting up that they were agents of the United States government, and held possession of the property in dispute as such agents, under the title of their principal. It was also suggested that the proceeding was in effect a suit against the federal government, and, because the consent of Congress had not been obtained, should abate. A trial before the court without a jury resulted in a judgment for defendants, and the state has appealed.
The contention that the suit cannot be maintained without the consent of Congress is abandoned in this court; it being conceded that this action comes within the rule announced in United States v. Lee, 106 U. S. 196, 1 Sup. Ct. 240, 27 L. Ed. 171. This leaves for our determination only two questions, viz.: Did the United States government get title to any land on the east end of Galveston Island by virtue of the annexation treaty with the republic of Texas? And if so, is the land in controversy a part of the land so acquired?
In January, 1838, the republic of Texas granted to Michael B. Menard a league and labor of land, according to the following description: This patent was issued pursuant to an act of Congress of the republic of Texas approved December 9, 1836, and the fifth section referred to in the grant is as follows: The Menard league is the site of the city of Galveston. By bill of date January 14, 1843, the Congress of Texas appropriated $7,000 for the erection and manning of fortifications for the better protection of Galveston Harbor; and it was therein further provided that a squad of men, commanded by a second lieutenant, should be raised and stationed at the fortification on Galveston Island to take charge of the guns and munitions of war at that point. There was nothing in this bill to designate the point on the island where the fortifications were situated. In the articles of annexation by which the republic of Texas became a state of the federal Union, she undertook to cede to the United States "all public edifices, fortifications, barracks, ports, harbors, navy and navy yards, docks, magazines, arms, armaments and all other property and means pertaining to the public defense belonging to said republic of Texas." All vacant unappropriated lands lying within her limits were retained. That all property falling within this description passed to the federal government upon the admission of the state into the Union is conceded by appellant. Whether, then, the federal government thereby acquired any land on the east end of Galveston Island, depends on whether at the date of admission into the Union the republic of Texas had devoted any land at that point to defensive purposes. Neither by the articles of annexation nor otherwise were any lands on the island conveyed to the United States by any more definite...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Balli, 8187; Motion No. 16405.
...shore. Act of 1840, Hartley's Digest, Art. 127; State v. Delesdenier, 7 Tex. 76; City of Galveston v. Menard, 23 Tex. 349; State v. Jadwin, Tex.Civ.App., 85 S.W. 490, writ refused; De Merit v. Robison, 102 Tex. 358, 116 S.W. The rule of strict construction would be applicable to the grantin......
-
Atchley v. Superior Oil Co.
...190 S.W.2d 71 (1944)); Hamilton v . State, 152 S.W. 1117, 1120 (Tex.Civ.App., Austin, 1912, error ref.).9 State v. Jadwin, 85 S.W. 490, 491 (Tex.Civ.App., Galveston, 1904, error ref.); Producers' Oil Co. v. State, 213 S.W. 349, 353 (Tex.Civ.App., San Antonio, 1919, no writ).10 E.g.: '(T)he ......
-
United States v. 1,078.27 ACRES OF LAND, GALVESTON CO., TEX.
...Menard, supra; State v. Galveston City Company, 1873, 38 Tex. 12; State v. Lain, 1961, 162 Tex. 549, 349 S.W.2d 579; and State v. Jadwin, Tex.Civ.App.1904, 85 S.W. 490, error dismissed, 209 U.S. 553, 28 S.Ct. 759, 52 L.Ed. In Menard accretion was not an issue. The case involved flats locate......
-
State by Kobayashi v. Midkiff
...land, it would prevail in the absence of a showing that the land was awarded. In re Pa Pelekane, 21 Haw. 175, 185 (1912); State v. Jadwin, 85 S.W. 490, 491-492 (Tex.Civ.App.). In this case it is not disputed that there was an award, the dispute being as to the extent of We first will review......