State v. Jennie Coulter Day Nursery, 2--56305
Decision Date | 22 May 1974 |
Docket Number | No. 2--56305,2--56305 |
Citation | 218 N.W.2d 579 |
Parties | STATE of Iowa, Appellant, v. JENNIE COULTER DAY NURSERY, Appellee. |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Richard C. Turner, Atty. Gen., Lorna Lawhead Williams, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
James M. Adams, Burlington, for appellee.
Heard before MOORE, C.J., and MASON, LeGRAND, REYNOLDSON and HARRIS, JJ.
The question on this appeal is whether defendant is operating a 'children's boarding home' requiring a license under the provisions of Code chapter 237. The trial court denied the State injunctive relief primarily on the ground defendant was not furnishing 'lodging' as required by section 237.2. It provides:
(Emphasis added).
In 1909 Miss Jennie Coulter opened a day nursery in Burlington. It was incorporated in 1934 under the name of The Jennie Coulter Day Nursery. It has always been operated as a charity, not a business, by the Norman Circle of Kings Daughters and Sons. The members give generously of their time and efforts. Its current matron has been so employed for 19 years. Approximately 80 percent of its operating budget is received from the Burlington Community Chest. No funds are received from any governmental unit. The State Department of Social Services knew of its operation for at least 20 years before initiating action to close the nursery in 1970.
Working mothers leave children, up to age seven, for care at the nursery. It is open from 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. No overnight care has ever been offered or provided. During the day the children are given snacks and a hot lunch. Playtime activities, television and adjacent outdoor play area are furnished. At trial time a daily charge of 25 cents for the first child and 10 cents for a second child was made. Other than suggested minor changes the State made no complaint regarding the facilities or the care given.
The State assigns three propositions for reversal; (1) the trial court erred in finding 'lodging' as used in section 237.2 does not include child care in day care facilities, (2) the trial court ignored the purpose and intent of the legislature in enacting the statute and (3) the trial court erred in not properly considering the interpretive rules promulgated by the Iowa Department of Social Services.
I. Both parties cite our holding in State v. Hay, 257 Iowa 51, 131 N.W.2d 452 in which we considered the meaning of 'lodging' as used in section 237.2. We therein held that under the stipulated facts the child care business as operated by Hay required a license. In the opinion at page 55, 257 Iowa, page 454, 131 N.W.2d, this significant statement is made: 'It is true that her daytime service is the more prevalent, but she has a program of overnight care, food and lodging.'
In addition to the various descriptions and definitions of 'lodging' and 'lodger' set out in Hay, we note the following:
Webster's Third New International Dictionary defines 'lodger' as 'one that lives or dwells in a place: one that passes the night in a place * * *' and 'lodging' as 'a place to live * * * a place in which to settle or come to rest * * * sleeping accommodations * * *.'
Black's Law Dictionary, Revised Fourth Edition, defines 'lodgings' as 'Habitation in another's house; apartments in another's house, furnished or unfurnished, occupied for habitation; the occupier being a 'lodger."
In Selvetti v. Building Inspector of Revere, 353 Mass. 645, 233 N.E.2d 915, 917, the court says: "(L)odging' is 'accommodation in a house, especially in rooms for rent."
Jackson v. Engert, Mo.App.1970, 453 S.W.2d 615, 618 states: '* * * a person who is enjoying accommodations at an inn or hotel under such conditions of permanency as to make the place his home or residence for the time being is not a guest but a boarder, or a lodger * * *.'
From these definitions it seems clear some permanency is required. However, the meaning of 'lodging' may vary according to the purpose for which that word is used. 43 C.J.S. Innkeepers § 3.
Code sectin 4.1(2) provides: 'Words and phrases shall be construed according to the context and the approved usage of the language; * * *.'
II. Although conceding we determined in State v. Hay, supra, that 'and' as used in 'food, care and lodging' is used in the conjunctive, the State argues the trial...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Blyth
...See Janson v. Fulton, 162 N.W.2d 438, 442--443 (Iowa 1968); State v. Vietor, 208 N.W.2d 894, 897 (Iowa 1973); State v. Jennie Coulter Day Nursery, 218 N.W.2d 579, 582 (Iowa 1974); and authorities cited in these opinions. It has been said 'the cardinal principle of statutory construction is ......
-
Millsap v. Cedar Rapids Civil Service Com'n
...be rendered superfluous. State ex rel. State Highway Commission v. City of Davenport, Iowa, 219 N.W.2d 503, 507; State v. Jennie Coulter Day Nursery, Iowa, 218 N.W.2d 579, 582. Chief Matias acted within his defined powers when he peremptorily suspended Lt. Millsap on May 24, 1973. We note t......
-
Berger v. General United Group, Inc.
...seek to give effect to all provisions of the Act, and do not presume statutes are repetitious or superfluous. State v. Jennie Coulter Day Nursery, 218 N.W.2d 579, 582 (Iowa 1974). Related statutes are read in Pari materia and terms of a specific statute control over those of a general statu......
-
State v. Nicoletto
...160 N.W.2d 499, 501 (Iowa 1968); State v. Bishop, 257 Iowa 336, 339–40, 132 N.W.2d 455, 457 (1965); accord State v. Jennie Coulter Day Nursery, 218 N.W.2d 579, 582 (Iowa 1974); Kruck v. Needles, 259 Iowa 470, 477, 144 N.W.2d 296, 301 (1966); Lever Bros. Co. v. Erbe, 249 Iowa 454, 469, 87 N.......