State v. Jewell
Decision Date | 13 December 1971 |
Docket Number | No. 55719,No. 1,55719,1 |
Citation | 473 S.W.2d 734 |
Parties | STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Michael Ray JEWELL, Appellant |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
John C. Danforth, Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, Charles B. Blackmar, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Louis, for respondent.
J. Arnot Hill, Kansas City, for appellant.
HIGGINS, Commissioner.
Michael Ray Jewell, indicated for murder, first degree, was convicted by a jury of murder, second degree. The jury also assessed his punishment at twenty-five years' imprisonment, and judgment and sentence were rendered accordingly. §§ 559.010, 559.020, 559.030, V.A.M.S.
The trial posture of this case was delineated by verdict-directing instructions on murder, first degree, felony-murder, first degree, murder, second degree, manslaughter, innocence, and by a converse instruction on defendant's theory of the case under which defendant could not be found guilty of any crime unless the jury first found that he participated in burglary of the rooms occupied by the murder victim.
Appellant places the case in the same posture here by charges of error in submitting the case without sufficient evidence and with respect to the converse instruction.
Appellant's principal contentions, Point I, is that 'the court erred in submitting to the jury the offense of murder in the second degree, there being no evidence to support a conviction of that offense' and thus 'violated due process of law.' In presentation of this point appellant asserts that he 'does not concede there was sufficient evidence * * * to convict him of murder in the First Degree under the Felony Murder doctrine and if that was done in the argument on this point it was done for the purpose of argument only.' Accordingly, the evidence will be stated in sufficient detail to demonstrate a case of felony-murder, first degree, and of murder, second degree.
Warren Shireman, on July 11 and 12, 1968, was the owner of Hagerwood Inn, 6135 Prospect, Kansas City, Jackson County, Missouri. His business was located on the first or ground floor of a two-story building. The second floor was a seven-room apartment, part of which was used as an office and housing for a safe, with the remainder being occupied by Mr. Shireman's son, Terry S. Shireman. The business also made use of a basement which had doors connecting to the first floor. There was no ingress to the second floor from the first floor; ingress and egress to and from the apartment were accomplished via an outside stairway. At 8:00 a.m., July 12, 1968, Mr. Shireman arrived at the Inn, learned from the bartender that the premises had been burglarized, and found that his coin-operated pool table, 'jukebox,' and cigarette machine had been broken and money removed from them and from a drawer. He went to the front door and upstairs to see if his son had heard anything. 'I went to his room, and he wasn't in bed, and I hollered for him and I couldn't find him, and I went back in his room and I saw blood on the bed, and then I just kept looking around until I found him on the other side of the bed * * *.' On his back on the other side of the bed, and the bed was put over him. * * * The bed had been put over his feet. His feet were under the bed, but tied. He was what they called mummy-wrapped in a piece of bedclothing, and his hands were tied,' with neckties. 'The whole bed had been lifted and placed over his feet.' His face was 'beat to a pulp.' He described his son as age 20, 'five-foot-ten, weighed 165, 170 pounds,' in good physical condition. He also noted that a sheet had been placed over the front withdow of the upstairs office. The window was 'right in front of the safe, which was in a closet.' Some of his son's clothing was missing, as were 'some odds and ends of change * * *.' He called the police when he first found the burglary and called again after discovering his son. Among those who arrived shortly was Kenneth Shireman, M.D., uncle of the deceased.
Dr. Shireman saw his nephew lying as described by the boy's father.
Angelo Lapi, M.D., chief pathologist at St. Mary's Hospital and deputy coroner for Jackson County, performed an autopsy on the body of Terry S. Shireman at 12:30 p.m., July 12, 1968. Excluding head injuries, he saw two marks on the wrists. 'They were grooves, on each wrist.' He found deceased to be He described the blows to cause such injuries as which could have been caused by a hand or a fist. Such blows caused injury to the brain. In his opinion, 'he died from brain injury due to multiple blunt impacts to the head.' He had been dead at the time of autopsy about ten or twelve hours.
Sergeant John Cowdrey of the Kansas City Police Department went to the scene of the homicide between 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m., June 12, 1968. He He noted the deceased lying in the condition described by Mr. Shireman, and The room with the sheet over the window also showed evidence of having been prowled.
Detective Robert Penson of the Kansas City Police Department also went to the scene and to the second-floor rear door at 6135 Prospect, and 'found the window glass broken from without * * * which would allow a person to reach in and open the door from the inside.'
Officer Billy Trollope investigated the burglary in the Hagerwood Inn area. He found that the coin-operated machines had been forcibly pried open. There were pry marks on a rear door which led from the lower basement level parking lot up a flight of steps into the tavern. 'This door was apparently not used too often and had been nailed up, and on the inside another door had been propped up * * * there were signs to show that the door had been pushed inward at the bottom, and the wooden frame was pulled loose from the concrete blocks, permitting an opening.'
Detective Earl Horner interrogated Michael Ray Jewell July 31, 1968. Jewell said his duties...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Handley
......1737 (1949), Aff'd 338 U.S. 345, 70 S.Ct. 172, 94 L.Ed. 155 (1949); Presnell v. Georgia, 439 U.S. 14, 99 S.Ct. 235, 236, 58 L.Ed.2d 207 (1978). . Although the state has referred us to cases such as State v. Williams, 529 S.W.2d 883 (Mo.banc 1975), and State v. Jewell, 473 S.W.2d 734 (Mo.1971), in which "instructing down" to murder second was permitted, we do not find them controlling on the issue here, for they were decided on charges filed under the murder statutes in force prior to September 28, 1975. Before that date, the proscription of the then "first ......
-
Boothe v. Wyrick, 77-0830-CV-W-4.
...(under § 559.010 as then in effect) a distinct offense but only one means of committing murder in the first degree. State v. Jewell, 473 S.W.2d 734, 738 (Mo.1971). Thus, an accusation which charges murder in the first degree in the common form allows proof of statutory felony-murder. State ......
-
State v. Chambers
...Section 559.020, supra, are the premeditated, willful, and intentional taking of a human life with malice aforethought, State v. Jewell, 473 S.W.2d 734 (Mo.1971). The elements of the two offenses are thus dissimilar. The commission of the underlying felony, stealing, is not an element of th......
-
State v. Woodard
...496 S.W.2d 257 (Mo. banc 1973), State v. Bruton, supra, State v. Strong, 339 S.W.2d 759 (Mo.1960), State v. Archer, supra, State v. Jewell, 473 S.W.2d 734 (Mo.1971). In the context of murder, State v. Marston, 479 S.W.2d 481 (Mo.1972), p. 484, defines willfulness as 'intentionally' or 'know......