State v. JH

Decision Date16 March 2005
Docket NumberNo. 4D03-3758.,4D03-3758.
Citation898 So.2d 240
PartiesSTATE of Florida, Appellant, v. J.H., a child, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, Ellen A. Griffin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

KLEIN, J.

The trial court granted J.H.'s motion to suppress on the ground that he was in custody when he turned over drugs to a school resource officer without a Miranda warning. We reverse because the officer had reasonable suspicion to search J.H. and the drugs would have inevitably been discovered.

J.H. was a high school student. A police officer working at the school was told by another student found with marijuana that J.H. had possessed marijuana earlier that day. The officer contacted the dean, the dean asked J.H. to step out of class, and the officer asked J.H. if he had anything improper on him. In response, J.H. reached into his pocket and handed the officer the marijuana.

J.H. moved to suppress arguing that a Miranda warning was required because this was custodial interrogation by the officer, and the trial court granted the motion. The state argues that the lack of a Miranda warning should not have been dispositive because the officer only needed reasonable suspicion to search J.H. New Jersey v. T.L.O., 469 U.S. 325, 105 S.Ct. 733, 83 L.Ed.2d 720 (1985) (reasonable suspicion is all that it necessary for a school official to search a student at school). Because the officer had reasonable suspicion to search J.H., the state argues, the drugs would have been discovered inevitably. J.A.R. v. State, 689 So.2d 1242 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) came to that conclusion under similar facts where it was reported that the student had a gun.

T.L.O. held that the probable cause standard for searches does not apply to the search of a student at school by a school official, and that reasonable suspicion is all that is required. In State v. D.S., 685 So.2d 41 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996), the court, after citing cases from other jurisdictions, held that school police officers are held to the same standard as school officials, reasonable suspicion, in order to search students at school. State v. Whorley, 720 So.2d 282 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (holding school resource officers need only reasonable suspicion for a search).

J.H. acknowledges that the standard is reasonable...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • M.D. v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 27, 2011
    ...is appropriate for searches of students on school grounds by school officials, including resource officers. See State v. J.H., 898 So.2d 240, 241 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); K.K. v. State, 717 So.2d 629, 630 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); State v. Whorley, 720 So.2d 282, 283 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); State v. D.S......
  • D.G. v. State
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 25, 2007
    ...— is widely regarded as itself providing the reasonable suspicion necessary to meet that constitutional test. See State v. J.H., 898 So.2d 240 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); State v. Bullard, 891 So.2d 1158, 1159-60 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); State v. Whorley, 720 So.2d 282 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); State v. D.S......
  • J.R. v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • August 30, 2012
    ...(Fla. 1st DCA 2011); State v. Whorley, 720 So.2d 282 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); State v. D.S., 685 So.2d 41 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997); State v. J.H., 898 So.2d 240 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); and K.K. v. State, 717 So.2d 629 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). 3. The current version of section 90.201, Florida Statutes, is unc......
  • S.C v. The State Of Fla., 3D10-1741
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • February 2, 2011
    ...Jo Bondi, Attorney General, for appellee. Before RAMIREZ, C.J., and GERSTEN and SALTER, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See State v. J.H., 898 So. 2d 240 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005). ...
1 books & journal articles
  • Removing Miranda from School Interrogations
    • United States
    • University of Nebraska - Lincoln Nebraska Law Review No. 99, 2021
    • Invalid date
    ...or to end the interview at will. Id. at 364 (quoting State v. Anderson, 937 S.W.2d 851, 855 (Tenn. 1996)). [162]Id. [163]Id. [164] 898 So. 2d 240 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. [165]Id. at 240. [166]Id. [167]Id. [168]Id. at 241. The J.H.court found, however, that even though the trial court "may well......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT