State v. Johnson
Decision Date | 01 October 1887 |
Parties | STATE v. JOHNSON. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
B. G. Boone, Atty. Gen., for the State. Geo. T. White, for plaintiff in error.
Defendant was indicted in the Cole county circuit court for arson in the second degree. Upon his plea of guilty, he was sentenced to 10 years' imprisonment in the penitentiary. Afterwards he filed his motion in arrest of the judgment, which being overruled, he presents the writ of error to this court.
The grounds alleged in the motion to meet the judgment are as follows: (1) That the indictment does not charge that defendant was lawfully confined in the penitentiary, and the length of term of his sentence and confinement given, nor the court that sentenced him; (2) that it does not allege that any one usually occupied or lodged in any of the shops or buildings at the time of setting fire to same; (3) that no ownership is alleged in the buildings burned; (4) the defendant is not described by his Christian or first name.
The indictment, omitting the formal parts of it, is as follows: "That one J. B. Johnson, being then and there a convict confined in the state penitentiary, then and there situate, the said penitentiary being then and there the state prison, wherein persons convicted of felonious crimes are usually confined and lodged, according to the statutes in such cases made and provided, wherein, also, certain officers, servants, and employes of said state, in charge of and employed in said penitentiary, usually, at the time aforesaid, did lodge, feloniously, willfully, and maliciously did set fire to the penitentiary aforesaid, the shops and other buildings therein contained, and the same then and there, by such firing as aforesaid, feloniously, willfully, and maliciously did burn, against the peace and dignity of the state."
As to the first point raised to the indictment, it may be said that section 1668, Rev. St., among other things, provides that, "if any convict shall commit any crime in the penitentiary, or in any county in this state, while under sentence, the court having jurisdiction of criminal offenses in such county shall have jurisdiction of such offense, and such convict may be charged, tried, and convicted in like manner as other persons." It will be observed...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ex parte Lamar
...74 Ind. 87; Perry v. State, 110 Ga. 234, 36 S.E. 781; Singleton v. State, 71 Miss. 782, 16 So. 295, 42 Am.St.Rep. 488; State v. Johnson, 93 Mo. 73, 5 S.W. 699; Ex Ryan, 10 Nev. 261. Whatever may be the merits of this contention, it has been, inferentially at least, adjudicated adverse to th......
-
The State v. Henson
...are likewise adverted to. However, we are not without precedents more concretely applicable to the contention here made. In State v. Johnson, 93 Mo. 73, 5 S.W. 699, an indictment for burning the State Penitentiary was held to sufficiently charge the crime, although no ownership in the publi......
-
George Kreitlein v. Charles Ferger
...240, 15 Jur. 657; State v. Webster, 30 Ark. 166; Perkins v. McDowell, 3 Wyo. 203, 19 Pac. 440; Minor v. State, 63 Ga. 320; State v. Johnson, 93 Mo. 73, 5 S. W. 699. There have, no doubt, been multitudes of instances in which initials have been used in listing creditors in bankrupt schedules......
-
State v. Henson
...are likewise adverted to. However, we are not without precedents more concretely applicable to the contention here made. In State v. Johnson, 93 Mo. 73, 5 S. W. 699, an indictment for burning the State Penitentiary was held to sufficiently charge the crime, although no ownership in the publ......