State v. Jones
Citation | 805 S.E.2d 701,255 N.C.App. 364 |
Decision Date | 05 September 2017 |
Docket Number | No. COA17-59,COA17-59 |
Parties | STATE of North Carolina, v. Daryl JONES, Defendant. |
Court | Court of Appeal of North Carolina (US) |
Attorney General Joshua H. Stein, by Assistant Attorney General Carole Biggers, for the State.
Appellate Defender Glenn Gerding, by Assistant Appellate Defender James R. Grant, for defendant-appellant.
Daryl Lamont Jones ("Defendant") appeals from the judgment entered following his conviction for operating a motor vehicle with an open container of alcohol while alcohol remained in his system. Defendant alleges the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction, arguing the citation issued to Defendant failed to state facts establishing each of the elements of the statutory offense. We disagree.
On January 4, 2015, Officer Donnie Johnson with the Raleigh Police Department stopped a vehicle driven by Defendant on New Bern Avenue. Officer Johnson estimated Defendant's speed to be approximately sixty-five miles per hour in a forty-five mile-per-hour zone. Officer Johnson approached Defendant's vehicle and noticed an open can of beer in the center console of Defendant's vehicle. After determining Defendant was not impaired, Officer Johnson issued Defendant a citation for speeding and operating a vehicle with an open container of alcohol in the car, while alcohol remained in his system. The citation read as follows:
Defendant was convicted of both offenses in District Court, and appealed the conviction to Superior Court. At trial in Superior Court, Defendant made a motion to dismiss the open container charge at the close of the State's evidence, arguing that the citation was "fatally defective" and the trial court lacked jurisdiction. Defendant asserted that the citation failed to include an essential element of an open container offense: operating a motor vehicle while on a public street or highway. The trial court, citing State v. Allen , ––– N.C. App. ––––, 783 S.E.2d 799 (2016), denied Defendant's motion. The jury found Defendant guilty of the open container charge and not guilty of speeding. Defendant timely filed notice of appeal.
The North Carolina Constitution states, N.C. Const. art. I, § 22. A "valid indictment returned by a legally constituted grand jury" is required for a court to have jurisdiction. State v. Yoes , 271 N.C. 616, 630, 157 S.E.2d 386, 398 (1967) (citations and quotation marks omitted).
However, "[t]he General Assembly may ... provide for other means of trial for misdemeanors, with the right of appeal for trial de novo." N.C. Const. art. I, § 24.
The Superior Court Division "has original general jurisdiction throughout the State except as otherwise provided by the General Assembly ; and the General Assembly is authorized by general law to prescribe the jurisdiction and powers of the district courts." State v. Wall , 271 N.C. 675, 680, 157 S.E.2d 363, 366 (1967) (emphasis in original). The General Assembly has indeed delineated the jurisdiction and procedure for trial of misdemeanors in the district courts, and provided for the right of appeal of those matters for trial de novo in the superior courts.
North Carolina General Statute § 7A-270 (2015) provides that "[g]eneral jurisdiction for the trial of criminal actions is vested in the superior court and the district court divisions of the General Court of Justice." The district court division has "exclusive, original jurisdiction" of misdemeanors, N.C. Gen Stat. § 7A-272(a) (2015), while superior courts, with limited exception, have "exclusive, original jurisdiction over all criminal actions not assigned to the district court division[.]" N.C. Gen Stat. § 7A-271(a) (2015).
Defendant was issued a citation for misdemeanor offenses and directed to appear in Wake County District Court. A citation directs a defendant to "appear in court and answer a misdemeanor or infraction charge or charges." N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-302(a) (2015). A law enforcement officer may issue a citation when he has probable cause to believe the individual cited committed an infraction or misdemeanor offense. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-302(b) (2015). For a citation to be valid, it must:
N. C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-302(c) (2015).
The official commentary to Article 49, entitled Pleadings and Joinder, contains a primer on various criminal pleadings in North Carolina. N.C. Gen. Stat. ch. 15A, art. 49 official commentary (2015). The commentary notes that misdemeanor cases initiated by warrant or criminal summons require a finding of probable cause and a "statement of the crime." Id. It is the "statement of the crime" set forth in warrants and criminal summons that constitutes the "pleading" for misdemeanor criminal cases. Id. Citations, however, are treated differently. According to the commentary, a citation simply needs to identify the crime charged.
It should be noted that the citation ( G.S. 15A-302 ) requires only that the crime be "identified," less than is required in the other processes. This is a reasonable difference, since it will be prepared by an officer on the scene. It still may be used as the pleading, but rather than get into sufficiency of the pleading in such a case the Commission simply gives the defendant the right to object and require a more formal pleading . G.S. 15A-922(c).
Id. (emphasis added). See also N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-302 official commentary (2015) ( .
To the extent there was a deficiency in the citation, Defendant had the right to object to trial on the citation by filing a motion:
A defendant charged in a citation with a criminal offense may by appropriate motion require that the offense be charged in a new pleading. The prosecutor must then file a statement of charges unless it appears that a criminal summons or a warrant for arrest should be secured in order to insure the attendance of the defendant, and in addition serve as the new pleading.
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-922(c) (2015). The statement of charges, summons, or warrant may then be subjected to the scrutiny argued for by Defendant. However, a defendant must file his or her objection to the citation in the district court division.
The defendant in State v. Allen , ––– N.C. App. ––––, ––––, 783 S.E.2d 799, 799 (2016) was charged by citation with, among other offenses, transporting an open container of alcohol. Defendant was convicted by a jury and, on appeal, he argued that the citation failed to allege all essential elements of the offense, depriving the court of jurisdiction. Id . at ––––, 783 S.E.2d at 800. This Court held that because the citation put the defendant on notice and met the statutory requirements of N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-302, his failure to object to the citation pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-922(c) precluded his challenge to jurisdiction. Id . at ––––, 783 S.E.2d at 801. The Court also stated:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Simpkins
...in all caps.) But at oral argument before this Court, defendant's counsel withdrew this argument and conceded that State v. Jones , ––– N.C. App. ––––, 805 S.E.2d 701 (2017), aff'd , ––– N.C. ––––, 819 S.E.2d 340 (2018), is the controlling authority on this issue, and defendant cannot preva......
- Rutledge v. Feher
-
State v. Ortiz
...to compel a person to answer for a crime." Black's Law Dictionary (11th ed. 2019); see also State v. Jones , ––– N.C. App. ––––, ––––, 805 S.E.2d 701, 710 (2017) (Zachary, J., dissenting) (citing Black's Law Dictionary's definition and Article 17's Official Commentary on what constitutes a ......
-
State v. Jones
...charged the offense was legally sufficient to properly invoke the trial court’s subject-matter jurisdiction. State v. Jones , ––– N.C. App. ––––, ––––, 805 S.E.2d 701, 706 (2017). The dissenting judge did not believe that the citation met the statutory requirements for a valid criminal plea......