State v. Joseph, 82-185
| Decision Date | 14 September 1982 |
| Docket Number | No. 82-185,82-185 |
| Citation | 419 So.2d 391 |
| Parties | The STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Richard JOSEPH, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Theda R. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Scott Silver, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellant.
Pollack, Komorowski & Headley and John H. Lipinski, Miami, for appellee.
Before BARKDULL and SCHWARTZ, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr. (Ret.), Associate Judge.
The State appeals from a pre-trial order excluding evidence, the effect of which order is to substantially impair the ability of the state to prosecute its case. We treat the notice of appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. State v. Steinbrecher, 409 So.2d 510 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).
Richard Joseph, while operating an automobile in daylight, committed a traffic violation which was observed by two City of Miami police officers in a patrol car. The officers turned on the patrol car lights, whereupon Joseph sped away with the patrol car in close pursuit. When Joseph made a left turn at an intersection, the officers observed a yellow plastic bag, distinctively marked with black and red stripes, being thrown from Joseph's automobile. This information was immediately relayed by radio to Officer Walters who was in another patrol car two blocks from the intersection, and who proceeded at once to the intersection where he retrieved a bag matching the description which he had received. Upon opening the bag, he found it to contain cocaine. He then delivered the bag to one of the patrol officers who identified it as one thrown from Joseph's car.
At the hearing on the motion to exclude the bag and its contents as evidence, there were some conflicts in the officers' testimony as to whether the bag had been thrown from the passenger's side or the driver's side of the Joseph vehicle, and whether the bag had been found by Officer Walters in the northwest quadrant or in the southwest quadrant of the intersection. The court, noting these conflicts, concluded that the State would be unable to prove that Joseph ever had in his possession the particular bag which was found at the intersection, as the facts did not show, to the court's satisfaction, that the bag recovered at the intersection was the same bag which was thrown from Joseph's vehicle. The court thereupon ruled that the bag would be irrelevant and immaterial to the charge of possession of cocaine and would be excluded from evidence.
The material fact issue in this...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Pettis
...DCA 1986); State v. Maisto, 427 So.2d 1120 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); State v. Busciglio, 426 So.2d 1233 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); State v. Joseph, 419 So.2d 391 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); State v. Horvatch, 413 So.2d 469 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982); State v. Love, 393 So.2d 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); State v. Dumas, 363 ......
-
Pineda v. State, 3D15–2542
...investigator and defense counsel's characterization of Sergeant Utset's investigation as "substandard at best." See State v. Joseph , 419 So.2d 391, 392 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982) ("Any evidence tending to prove or disprove a material fact is relevant, and any fact relevant to the issue is admissib......
-
Barnes v. State, AX-178
...whether or not appellant was present at the drug transaction between his father and the undercover officer. See: State v. Joseph, 419 So.2d 391, 392 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). Appellant may be correct in asserting that the proffered evidence was relevant to the issue of John Barnes's credibility. ......
-
Estate of Palmer, In re, 91-0668
...600 So.2d 537 ... In re ESTATE OF Joseph Wellington PALMER, Deceased ... No. 91-0668 ... 600 So.2d 537, 17 Fla. L. Week. D1514 ... ...