State v. Kaiser
Decision Date | 20 November 1894 |
Citation | 28 S.W. 182,124 Mo. 651 |
Parties | STATE v. KAISER et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
5. Counsel for the state, in his argument, stated that The court corrected him, saying that and counsel submitted to the court's version of the testimony. In fact, S. had said, after minutely describing the man, that he "would not swear defendant was the man, but he resembled him." Held, that there was no ground for reversal.
Appeal from St. Louis criminal court; Henry L. Edmunds, Judge.
Henry Kaiser and Jacob Henze were convicted of murder in the first degree, and appeal. Affirmed.
The defendants, Kaiser and Henze, were jointly indicted with Charles McDonnell at the March term, 1893, of the St. Louis criminal court, for the murder of Edwin E. Brown, in the city of St. Louis, on March 2, 1893. A motion to quash was overruled. The prisoners were duly arraigned at the May term, 1893, and the cause continued to the July term, at which they were jointly tried, and Kaiser and Henze convicted of murder in the first degree, and McDonnell acquitted. Motions for new trial and in arrest were duly entered and overruled, and the defendants sentenced at the November term, 1893, from which they appeal. The testimony for the state tended to show that Edwin E. Brown was a live-stock commission merchant, residing at No. 3119a Morgan street, St. Louis. He had resided there since June 1, 1892. On the night of March 2, 1893 (on which day a primary election had been held), at or near 10 o'clock, he was violently assaulted by three men on Franklin avenue, near Garrison avenue (about a block and a half from his residence), and died within an hour. A valuable gold watch, containing a likeness of his little dead son, was missing from his person, and was never recovered. The autopsy showed that death was caused by internal hemorrhage, due to the rupture of blood vessels in the abdomen, the result of external violence. Deceased was about 5 feet 10 inches in height, weighed 230 pounds, and was abnormally fat in the abdominal muscles. The principal eye-witnesses of the assault were three negro women, — Carrie Chapman, Betty Robinson, and Annie Boghines. The former two were domestics living with families in the west end, and were returning from church in company; the latter kept furnished rooms at 873 North Eighth street, and had been spending the evening visiting her husband, who worked for the Lindell Railroad Company. There had been a drizzling rain during the afternoon and up to about 8 o'clock, but it had cleared off afterwards; the streets were wet and muddy. The place where the struggle occurred was at the entrance of the driveway of Mr. Niedringhaus' residence, leading into a yard at the rear of which was a stable, standing on Bell street. Below the stable was a swinging electric light, and there was another electric light on Franklin avenue, both of which cast a strong light over the yard and avenue. The uniform testimony of the witnesses is that this double light was brilliant, and not dim. The clothes taken from the body of deceased when conveyed home were muddy; "there was a patch of mud along the right vest pocket, and down along the right leg; the patch along the abdomen looked like it might have been a kick."
The testimony of Carrie Chapman was that she and Betty Robinson were going west on Franklin avenue; they heard a noise, and saw three men meet one man,
Betty Robinson gave evidence that she was with the preceding witness, walking at their usual gait, until they reached Niedringhaus' place.
The other negro woman, Annie Boghines, testified subsequently as follows: "I was walking on the street [Franklin avenue]. I noticed in front of me two colored women, and one white gentleman walking just a little piece ahead of them. In a few moments, I saw the gentlemen coming across Franklin avenue on Garrison, cross over on Garrison, and turned down like they was facing me. In a moment's time they passed Niedringhaus' front door. They met this man, that was in front of the colored woman, and one of them mentioned money, — `Money or life.' They commenced a tight scrimmage right there. * * * So this man sitting right there [Henze], he fired off and struck Mr. Brown over the eye. There was something shined or bright in his hand. I couldn't say whether it was a...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cromeenes v. San Pedro, Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad Co.
...Mo. 240, 17 S.W. 946, 14 L. R. A. 613; Railway Co. v. Murray, 55 Ark. 248, 18 S.W. 50, 16 L. R. A. 787, 29 Am. St. Rep. 32; State v. Kaiser, 124 Mo. 651, 28 S.W. 182.) I invite attention to an elaborate discussion of this question found in a note to Louisville v. Johnson, supra, reported in......
-
State v. Taylor
...alleged crime. They were a narrative of past events. State v. Rider, 90 Mo. 54, 1 S.W. 825; State v. Walker, 78 Mo. 380; State v. Kaiser, 124 Mo. 651, 28 S.W. 182; State v. Seward, 247 S.W. 150; 10 R.C.L. 974-976; Rogers v. State, 88 Ark. 451, 114 S.W. 156, 41 L.R.A. (N.S.) 857; State v. Ha......
-
Lavender v. Kurn
... ... 866; Redmon v. Met. St. Ry. Co., 185 ... Mo. 1, 84 S.W. 26; Ruschenberg v. So. Elec. Ry. Co., ... 161 Mo. 70, 61 S.W. 626; State ex rel. Bankers Life Ins ... Co. v. Reynolds, 277 Mo. 14, 208 S.W. 618; Landau v ... Travelers Ins. Co., 305 Mo. 563, 267 S.W. 376; Woods ... & P. Co., 276 S.W. 105; Goucher v ... Woodmen Accident Co. of Lincoln, Neb., 231 Mo.App. 573, ... 104 S.W.2d 289; State v. Kaiser, 124 Mo 651, 28 S.W ... 182; Soderstrom v. Mo. Pac. R. Co., 141 S.W.2d 73; ... Sculley v. Rowling, 88 S.W.2d 394; May v ... Chicago, B. & ... ...
-
Odom v. Langston
... ... necessary connection with the main fact it may be admitted by ... whom it was made or done. State v. Kaiser, 124 Mo ... 651; Crothers v. Gibson, 19 Mo. 365. (17) While ... prior disconnected declarations or facts must be excluded, a ... ...