State v. Kasold
Decision Date | 17 April 1974 |
Docket Number | No. 2819,2819 |
Citation | 110 Ariz. 563,521 P.2d 995 |
Parties | The STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Robert Take KASOLD, Appellant. |
Court | Arizona Supreme Court |
Gary K. Nelson, Atty. Gen., by Shirley H. Frondorf, Special Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, for appellee.
Derickson & Kemper, by James Hamilton Kemper, Phoenix, for appellant.
This is an appeal from sentences only after jury verdicts and judgments of guilt to six counts of rape, second degree, § 13--611(B), as amended 1962, and § 13--614(B) A.R.S., together with sentences as to each count of not less than fifteen years nor more than life, all sentences to run concurrently.
We need consider only one question on appeal and that is whether the search of the defendant's premises was made as a result of a constitutionally infirm search warrant. The facts necessary for a determination of this matter on appeal are as follows. In December of 1972, a female student at North Phoenix Union High School in Phoenix, Arizona, told school authorities that during the previous spring she and another student had engaged in sexual activities with the defendant, Robert Kasold, an English teacher at the high school. The school authorities interrogated the other student and the police were called to conduct a further investigation. On the 2nd day of January, 1973, an affidavit in support of a request for a search warrant was filed with Justice of the Peace Al Flood. The affidavit, after describing the name of the defendant and the places to be searched (the apartment and the automobile), contained the following:
'That the following facts establish probable cause for believing that grounds for the issuance of a search warrant for the aforementioned items exist:
'Between the dates December 20 and December 21, 1972, the affiant learned the following information in the following manner:
'Frequently during the sexual activity Mr. Kasold used a blue and white vibrator to stimulate the girls sexually.
'During the course of this investigation, your affiant has personally determined that Mr. Kasold is, in fact, a teacher employed by North High School and that he does in fact now reside at 5105 North 40th Street, Apt. E-425, and further that Mr. Kasold possesses a vehicle that is a 1968 Citron bearing Arizona license MMD-942.
'Further investigation into this matter by your affiant has revealed that prior to this time Mr. Kasold's activity as it relates to dealing with his students has been the subject of concern by various school administrators and that he has been the subject of psychological counselling.
'Further investigation has revealed that Mr. Kasold has spent an unusually large amount of time engaging in extra-curricular activities with the students.
'Your affiant has personally spent several hours in meticulously examining statements given by these two females and feels confident that the allegations by the girls in this matter are true.
As the result of the search warrant, between 500 and 600 photographs of a sexual nature, as well as books and other sex-related paraphernalia were obtained. Included in the photographs were pictures of the two victims involved in this particular case, as well as a roll of film upon which the conviction of the defendant in the companion case, State v. Kasold, 110 Ariz. 558, 521 P.2d 990, filed this day, was based.
The defendant made a timely motion to suppress all of these items based upon the ground that the seizure was an unlawful search and seizure in violation of the Fourth and ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Russo
...n. 22 supra, regarding this pedophile's method of producing and using pornography to molest children.40 See also State v. Kasold, 110 Ariz. 563, 521 P.2d 995 (1974), where the information supporting the warrant was five months old. The decision of the Arizona Supreme Court in Kasold was rev......
-
Behrel v. State
...items sought are "`of a sexual nature which it is reasonable to believe the defendant intended to keep.'") (quoting State v. Kasold, 110 Ariz. 563, 521 P.2d 995, 998 (1974)); see also United States v. Agosto, 43 M.J. 745, 747, 748, 749 (A.F.Ct. Crim.App.1995) (finding probable cause for sea......
-
Daschke v. Hartenstein
...Cir. 2012) (" ‘Staleness’ is highly relevant to the legality of a search for a perishable or consumable object"); cf. State v. Kasold , 110 Ariz. 563, 521 P.2d 995, 998 (1974) (Five month delay in seeking a warrant was acceptable where "[t]he evidence sought to be obtained was not the type ......
-
Lucas v. State
...and slides are items more likely to be retained than discarded. See State v. Smith, 122 Ariz. 58, 593 P.2d 281 (1979); State v. Kasold, 110 Ariz. 558, 521 P.2d 995 (1974). Finally, we believe an error in stating the apartment address was not fatally defective. The search warrant enabled the......