State v. Kibby

Decision Date30 April 1842
Citation7 Mo. 317
PartiesTHE STATE v. KIBBY AND OTHERS.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ANDREW COUNTY.

BURNETT & JONES, for State.

SCOTT, J.

An indictment was found against Kibby and others, containing two counts, one charging them with acting as grocers, without license, and the other with keeping a dramshop, without license. On the trial, the Circuit Court compelled the circuit attorney to elect on which count he would proceed. This was objected to, and is the error assigned. The joinder of several offenses in the same indictment in different counts, is no cause of demurrer, or arrest of judgment. But in such cases, when the crimes alleged are felonies, the court will compel the prosecutor to elect on which one he will proceed. This, however, is never done where the indictment is for misdemeanors. Storrs v. State, 3 Mo. R. 8.(a)

(a). See note to this case. State v. Fletcher, 18 Mo. R. 425. See also, State v. Jackson, 17 Mo. R. 544, as to felonies.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • State v. Florian
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • February 10, 1947
    ...compelled an election by the state between counts 1 and 3. State v. Gant, 33 S.W.2d 970; State v. Brown, 317 Mo. 361, 296 S.W. 125; State v. Kibby, 7 Mo. 317. The court had no right to order stricken from record part of argument of defendant's counsel, merely because it believed the argumen......
  • State v. Testerman
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • October 31, 1878
    ...Procedure, § 208; 1 Chitty Crim. Law, 253; State v. Porter, 26 Mo. 201,; State v. Jackson, 17 Mo. 544; Storrs v. State, 3 Mo. 9; State v. Kibby, 7 Mo. 317; Baker v. State, 4 Pike 56; Kane v. People, 8 Wend. 203; People v. Rynders, 12 Wend. 425; State v. Nelson, 8 N. H. 163; State v. Coleman......
  • The State v. Lief
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 18, 1913
    ...the trial court whether the State shall be put to an election. [1 Bishop's New Crim. Prac. sec. 452; State v. Pigg, 85 Mo.App. 399; State v. Kibby, 7 Mo. 317.] Appellant claims that the last sentence in section 6605, Revised Statutes 1909, requiring the fines recovered under the provisions ......
  • State v. Lief
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 18, 1913
    ...of the trial court whether the state shall be put to an election. 1 Bishop's New Crim. Prac. § 452; State v. Pigg, 85 Mo. App. 399; State v. Kibby, 7 Mo. 317. 2. Appellant claims that the last sentence in section 6605 of the Revised Statutes, requiring the fines recovered under the provisio......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT