State v. Kimmons

Decision Date16 April 1907
Citation101 S.W. 683,124 Mo.App. 498
PartiesSTATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. KIMMONS, Appellant
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Appeal from Greene Circuit Court.--Hon. James J. Gideon, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Judgment affirmed.

A. H. Wear for appellant.

Roscoe Patterson for respondent.

OPINION

BLAND, P. J.

The grand jury, at the November, 1903, term, of the Greene County Criminal Court, returned a good and sufficient indictment against the defendant, charging, in substance, that he, as a druggist and proprietor of a drugstore, at the county of Greene on October 1, 1903, did unlawfully sell to one Homer Rose, intoxicating liquor in less quantity than four gallons, without a prescription and not to be used for sacramental, mechanical or scientific purposes. Defendant pleaded "not guilty" to the indictment, and by agreement of both parties the issues were submitted to the court, sitting as a jury, who, after hearing the evidence, found defendant guilty and assessed his punishment at a fine of one hundred dollars.

The filing of a motion for new trial is a prerequisite to a review, by an appellate court, of any error committed by the trial court, which error does not appear on the face of the record. [Taylor v. Brotherhood of Railway Trainmen, 106 Mo.App. 212, 80 S.W. 306; Strauss v. St. Louis Transit Co., 102 Mo.App. 644, 77 S.W. 156.] And it is a well-settled rule of appellate practice, that the filing of a motion for a new trial must be shown by the record proper, and a mere recital of its filing in the bill of exceptions is insufficient to show that it was filed. [Turney v. Ewins, 97 Mo.App. 620, 71 S.W. 543; Hayes v. Continental Casualty Co., 98 Mo.App. 410, 72 S.W. 135; Lapsley v. Bank, 105 Mo.App. 98, 78 S.W. 1095.] It is recited in the bill of exceptions, that the motion for new trial was filed, but no recital or entry of that fact is found in the record proper, therefore, there is nothing before us for review but the record proper. As we have said, the indictment is in legal form, it is a model, and all the proceedings shown by the record are regular and in proper form.

The judgment is affirmed. All concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT