State v. Kurt, 64360

Decision Date21 December 1993
Docket NumberNo. 64360,64360
Citation867 S.W.2d 675
PartiesSTATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Bruce Woodruff KURT, Appellant.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Bruce Woodruff Kurt, pro se.

Robert P. McCulloch, Pros. Atty., St. Louis County, Clayton, for respondent.

Before GARY M. GAERTNER, C.J., and SIMON and PUDLOWSKI, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Bruce Woodruff Kurt, appeals from his misdemeanor conviction of driving while his license was suspended, entered in the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis, for which he was sentenced to one year imprisonment in the county jail and a $50.00 fine. We dismiss the appeal.

Appellant originally filed his appeal with the Missouri Supreme Court. The appeal was transferred to this court where proper jurisdiction was vested.

Our review of appellant's brief establishes an abundance of egregious violations of Rule 84.04(a), (c), (d), and (e). Appellant fails to include Points Relied On, fails to include a list of authorities, and fails to provide "a fair and concise statement of facts" as required by Rule 84.04. We find that appellant has preserved nothing for this court to review. See Jones v. Jones, 819 S.W.2d 773, 774 (Mo.App., E.D.1991); Wehmeyer v. Bassett Realty, Inc., 840 S.W.2d 290, 291 (Mo.App., S.D.1992). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Burton v. Tucker
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • February 6, 1997
    ...Allegations of error not properly briefed "shall not be considered in any civil appeal ...." Rule 84.13(a). In State v. Kurt, 867 S.W.2d 675 (Mo.App.1993), the appeal was dismissed for similar, albeit fewer, Rule 84.04 violations as exist here. Accordingly, we dismiss the 1 Rule references ......
  • Bunch v. Ridenhour, 64734
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • October 4, 1994
    ...Accordingly, due to the abundance and nature of the errors contained in appellant's brief, we dismiss the appeal. See State v. Kurt, 867 S.W.2d 675, 676 (Mo.App.E.D.1993); Jones v. Jones, 819 S.W.2d 773, 774 1 Specifically, Kathy Bunch, Leslie K. Bunch, Connie Bunch, David Bunch, Gene Bunch......
  • Libberton v. Phillips
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • July 12, 1999
    ...ex rel. Div. of Child Support Enforcement v. Hinojos, 993 S.W.2d 581, 583 (Mo.App.S.D.1999), Burton, 937 S.W.2d 775, and State v. Kurt, 867 S.W.2d 675 (Mo.App.1993), appeals were dismissed for similar Rule 84.04 violations. Accordingly, we dismiss the CROW, P.J., and PARRISH, J., concur. 1 ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT