State v. Kurt, 64360
Decision Date | 21 December 1993 |
Docket Number | No. 64360,64360 |
Citation | 867 S.W.2d 675 |
Parties | STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Bruce Woodruff KURT, Appellant. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Bruce Woodruff Kurt, pro se.
Robert P. McCulloch, Pros.Atty., St. Louis County, Clayton, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, C.J., and SIMON and PUDLOWSKI, JJ.
Appellant, Bruce Woodruff Kurt, appeals from his misdemeanor conviction of driving while his license was suspended, entered in the Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis, for which he was sentenced to one year imprisonment in the county jail and a $50.00 fine.We dismiss the appeal.
Appellant originally filed his appeal with the Missouri Supreme Court.The appeal was transferred to this court where proper jurisdiction was vested.
Our review of appellant's brief establishes an abundance of egregious violations of Rule 84.04(a), (c), (d), and (e).Appellant fails to include Points Relied On, fails to include a list of authorities, and fails to provide "a fair and concise statement of facts" as required by Rule 84.04.We find that appellant has preserved nothing for this court to review.SeeJones v. Jones, 819 S.W.2d 773, 774(Mo.App., E.D.1991);Wehmeyer v. Bassett Realty, Inc., 840 S.W.2d 290, 291(Mo.App., S.D.1992).Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Burton v. Tucker
...Allegations of error not properly briefed "shall not be considered in any civil appeal ...." Rule 84.13(a). In State v. Kurt, 867 S.W.2d 675 (Mo.App.1993), the appeal was dismissed for similar, albeit fewer, Rule 84.04 violations as exist here. Accordingly, we dismiss the 1 Rule references ......
-
Bunch v. Ridenhour, 64734
...Accordingly, due to the abundance and nature of the errors contained in appellant's brief, we dismiss the appeal. See State v. Kurt, 867 S.W.2d 675, 676 (Mo.App.E.D.1993); Jones v. Jones, 819 S.W.2d 773, 774 1 Specifically, Kathy Bunch, Leslie K. Bunch, Connie Bunch, David Bunch, Gene Bunch......
-
Libberton v. Phillips
...ex rel. Div. of Child Support Enforcement v. Hinojos, 993 S.W.2d 581, 583 (Mo.App.S.D.1999), Burton, 937 S.W.2d 775, and State v. Kurt, 867 S.W.2d 675 (Mo.App.1993), appeals were dismissed for similar Rule 84.04 violations. Accordingly, we dismiss the CROW, P.J., and PARRISH, J., concur. 1 ......