State v. Labinski, 60P08.
| Decision Date | 10 April 2008 |
| Docket Number | No. 60P08.,60P08. |
| Parties | STATE of North Carolina v. Tara Nicole LABINSKI. |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 15th day of February 2008 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of April 2008."
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 15th day of February 2008 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 10th day of April 2008."
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Daniel
...it is the duty of the trial court to resolve the conflict and such resolution will not be disturbed on appeal.' " State v. Labinski, 188 N.C.App. 120, 124, 654 S.E.2d 740, 743 (quoting State v. Lewis, 147 N.C.App. 274, 277, 555 S.E.2d 348, 351 (2001)), disc. rev. denied, 362 N.C. 367, 661 S......
-
State v. Cox
...must appear that the statutory violation caused irreparable prejudice to the preparation of defendant's case." State v. Labinski , 188 N.C.App. 120, 124, 654 S.E.2d 740, 742-43 (citation, quotation marks, and italics omitted), disc. review denied , 362 N.C. 367, 661 S.E.2d 889 (2008). The s......
-
State v. Cloer
...in the record to show that defendant requested, or was denied, access to anyone.” Id.at 597, 355 S.E.2d at 264.In State v. Labinski,188 N.C.App. 120, 654 S.E.2d 740 (2008), the defendant alleged that the magistrate denied her access to family and friends during a critical time of her pretri......
-
State v. Ledbetter
...must appear that the statutory violation caused irreparable prejudice to the preparation of defendant's case." State v. Labinski , 188 N.C. App. 120, 124, 654 S.E.2d 740, 742-43 (emphasis original) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted), review denied , 362 N.C. 367, 661 S.E.2d 889......