State v. Layton

Citation114 Or.App. 637,834 P.2d 553
PartiesSTATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. John Gene LAYTON, Appellant. 90-60221; CA A71859.
Decision Date07 October 1992
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

Richard L. Fredericks, Springfield, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Lynn S. Walsh, Certified Law Student, and Thorp, Dennett, Purdy, Golden & Jewett, P.C., Springfield.

Meg Kieran, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Kaye Ellen Sunderland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem.

Before WARREN, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • State v. King
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Oregon
    • May 28, 1993
    ...unanimity The Court of Appeals affirmed, respectively, in State v. King, 114 Or.App. 32, 834 P.2d 463 (1992), and State v. Layton, 114 Or.App. 637, 834 P.2d 553 (1992). We allowed review and consolidated the cases to consider whether this court's decision requiring jury unanimity in State v......
  • State v. Layton
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Oregon
    • November 24, 1992
    ...454 843 P.2d 454 314 Or. 727 State v. Layton (John Gene) NOS. A71859, S39624 Supreme Court of Oregon Nov 24, 1992 114 Or.App. 637, 834 P.2d 553 ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT