State v. Layton
Citation | 114 Or.App. 637,834 P.2d 553 |
Parties | STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. John Gene LAYTON, Appellant. 90-60221; CA A71859. |
Decision Date | 07 October 1992 |
Court | Court of Appeals of Oregon |
Richard L. Fredericks, Springfield, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Lynn S. Walsh, Certified Law Student, and Thorp, Dennett, Purdy, Golden & Jewett, P.C., Springfield.
Meg Kieran, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Charles S. Crookham, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Kaye Ellen Sunderland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem.
Before WARREN, P.J., and RIGGS and EDMONDS, JJ.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. King
...unanimity The Court of Appeals affirmed, respectively, in State v. King, 114 Or.App. 32, 834 P.2d 463 (1992), and State v. Layton, 114 Or.App. 637, 834 P.2d 553 (1992). We allowed review and consolidated the cases to consider whether this court's decision requiring jury unanimity in State v......
-
State v. Layton
...454 843 P.2d 454 314 Or. 727 State v. Layton (John Gene) NOS. A71859, S39624 Supreme Court of Oregon Nov 24, 1992 114 Or.App. 637, 834 P.2d 553 ...