State v. Lee
Decision Date | 16 February 2022 |
Docket Number | Appellate Case 2019-001405,2022-UP-070 |
Court | South Carolina Court of Appeals |
Parties | The State, Respondent, v. Antonio Ricardo Lee, Appellant. |
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
Submitted January 1, 2022
Appeal From Beaufort County Deadra L. Jefferson, Circuit Court Judge
Appellate Defender Victor R. Seeger, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of Columbia and Solicitor Isaac McDuffie Stone, III, of Bluffton, all for Respondent.
Antonio Ricardo Lee appeals his convictions for trafficking cocaine 200-400g; possession with intent to distribute heroin, second offense; possession with intent to distribute a controlled substance within proximity to a park; and possession of marijuana and his aggregate sentence of twenty-five years. On appeal, Lee argues the trial court erred in refusing to compel the State to disclose the identity of a confidential informant whose recorded phone call with a third party spurred law enforcement's investigation of Lee.
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Lee's motion for disclosure of the informant's identity because the informant was merely a "tipster," rather than an active participant in the crimes for which Lee was convicted. Accordingly, we affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b) SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Edwards, 384 S.C. 504, 508, 682 S.E.2d 820, 822 (2009) () ; State v. Batson, 261 S.C. 128, 134-35, 198 S.E.2d 517, 520 (1973) () ; State v. Bultron, 318 S.C. 323, 330, 457 S.E.2d 616, 620 (Ct. App. 1995) (); id. at 331, 457...
To continue reading
Request your trial