State v. Lewis

Decision Date11 June 1906
PartiesSTATE v. LEWIS.
CourtWashington Supreme Court

Appeal from Superior Court, Chehalis County; Mason Irwin, Judge.

George Lewis was convicted of burglary, and appeals. Affirmed.

Austin M. Wade, for appellant.

E. E Boner, for the State.

FULLERTON J.

The appellant was informed against for the crime of burglary, the charging part of the information being as follows: 'The said George Lewis, on the 8th day of December, A. D. 1905, in the county of Chehalis, in the state aforesaid, then and there being, did then and there, in the nighttime of said day, feloniously and unlawfully break and unlawfully enter the warehouse of the Northern Pacific Railway Company, a corporation doing business in the state of Washington, said warehouse then and there being a building in which goods merchandise, and valuable things were kept on deposit, and situated in the city of Montesano, in the county and state aforesaid, with the intent then and there to commit a misdemeanor or felony therein.' To this information the appellant demurred on the ground that it was not direct and certain as to the crime charged, and after trial and conviction moved in arrest of judgment on the same ground, contending that the information was fatally defective because it charged the intent with which the building was entered in the alternative.

The general rule undoubtedly is that, where a statute enumerates in the alternative several acts the doing of which constitutes a crime, or where the intent or purpose necessary to constitute the offense is set out in several aspects disjunctively, it is necessary, if the several acts or several intents or purposes are to be joined in one indictment or information, to state them conjunctively, using the copulative 'and,' where the statute uses the disjunctive 'or.' But this rule, in so far as it relates to the intent in an indictment or information for burglary, has been changed by statute in this state. Burglary, as defined by section 7104 of the Code (Ballinger's Ann. Codes & St.), consists of the unlawful entry in the nighttime, or the unlawful breaking and entry in the daytime, of any building in which goods and merchandise or valuable things are kept for use, sale, or deposit, with intent to commit a misdemeanor or felony. By section 7105, Ballinger's Ann. Codes & St., it is provided that any person who makes such unlawful entry, or breaking and entry, as defined in the preceding section shall be deemed to have made the same with intent to commit a misdemeanor or felony, unless the entry is explained by testimony satisfactory to the jury trying the case to have been made for some purpose without...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • State v. Chelly
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • September 15, 1982
    ...853 (1971); see also Linbeck v. State, 1 Wash. 336, 25 P. 452 (1890); State v. Wilson, 9 Wash. 218, 37 P. 424 (1894); State v. Lewis, 42 Wash. 672, 85 P. 668 (1906). The Washington rule followed from the former presumption of intent statute, RCW Every person who shall ... unlawfully enter a......
  • Bayless v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • July 19, 1967
    ...nor what crime the defendant intended to commit after his entry. See State v. Murie, 140 Wash. 71, 248 P. 79 (1926); State v. Lewis, 42 Wash. 672, 85 P. 668 (1906); State v. Wilson, 9 Wash. 218, 37 P. 424 (1894). It is not difficult to see why the word "unlawfully" in § 9.19.030 has not bee......
  • State v. Murie
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • July 28, 1926
    ... ... 1052 ... Nor is ... it necessary, in a prosecution for burglary, under our ... statute to allege what offense was intended by the accused to ... be committed in the premises at the time of the unlawful ... entry, as contended by appellant. State v. Lewis, 42 ... Wash. 672, 85 P. 668 ... It ... developed during the trial that the house alleged to have ... been burglarized was not constantly occupied as a dwelling ... house, but was used more as a summer residence. The court ... therefore limited the ... ...
  • State v. Bergeron
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • March 16, 1967
    ...Laws of 1873, Criminal Practice Act, §§ 48, 49, at 190.13 See State v. Murie, 140 Wash. 71, 75, 248 P. 79 (1926); State v. Lewis, 42 Wash. 672, 673-74, 85 P. 668 (1906); State v. Wilson, 9 Wash. 218, 219-20, 37 P. 424 (1894); Bayless v. United States, 381 F.2d 67, 76 (9th Cir.1967).14 Forme......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT