State v. Liles
| Decision Date | 30 June 1877 |
| Citation | State v. Liles, 77 N.C. 496 (N.C. 1877) |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE v. MARTIN LILES and others. |
INDICTMENT for Larceny tried at Spring Term, 1877, of ANSON Superior Court, before McKoy, J.
The defendants moved to quash the indictment on the ground that one of the grand jurors who found the bill against them was disqualified by Bat. Rev. ch. 17, § 229 (g) which is as follows; “If any of the jurors drawn have a suit pending and at issue in the Superior Court, the scrolls with their names must be returned into partition No. 1 of the jury box.”
His Honor allowed the motion and Pemberton, Solicitor for the State, appealed.
Attorney General, for the State .
No counsel for the defendants.
The defendants were indicted and on being called to answer the charge, moved to quash the indictment on the ground that one of the grand jurors who presented the bill, at the time he was drawn as juror, had a suit pending and at issue in the Superior Court of the same County. The motion was allowed and the Solicitor appealed. We sustain the order of His Honor, and hold that the juror was disqualified simply because the law is so written. Bat. Rev. ch. 17, § 229, (g).
In such cases the objection must be taken in apt time as was done in the present instance. State v. Griffice, 74 N. C. 316.
There is no error. Let this be...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
State v. Rother
...by proof. It will be presumed that the disqualified juror was present, and acted with his fellows. State v. Smith, 80 N.C. 410; State v. Lyles, 77 N.C. 496. . . . But unqualified opinion of the defendant's guilt disqualifies, even though formed in finding a previous indictment, since quashe......
- State v. Hawkins