State v. Lumpkin
| Decision Date | 27 October 1994 |
| Citation | 320 Or. 315,882 P.2d 602 |
| Parties | STATE of Oregon, Respondent on Review, v. Jamie Dale LUMPKIN, Petitioner on Review. CC 91CR0280ST; CA A72934; SC S41661. |
| Court | Oregon Supreme Court |
David C. Degner, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, filed the petition for petitioner on review. With him on the petition was Sally L. Avera, Public Defender, Salem.
No appearance contra.
Before CARSON, C.J., and GILLETTE, VAN HOOMISSEN, FADELEY, UNIS and GRABER, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The petition for review is allowed. The decision of the Court of Appeals is vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in the light of State v. Hoskinson, 320 Or. 83, 879 P.2d 180 (1994).
* Appeal from Deschutes County Circuit Court, Stephen Tiktin, Judge. 129 Or.App. 601, 880 P.2d 468 (1994).
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
State v. Rickard
...by-pass the statutory procedures set forth in ORS 131.625). Cf. State v. Lumpkin, 129 Or.App. 601, 606, 880 P.2d 468, rev den 320 Or. 315, 882 P.2d 602 (1994) ("reasonableness in all circumstances" is the key inquiry under ORS 131.625), on remand 133 Or.App. 265, 891 P.2d 660, rev den 321 O......
-
State v. Lumpkin
...v. Lumpkin, 129 Or.App. 601, 880 P.2d 468 (1994), in the light of State v. Hoskinson, 320 Or. 83, 879 P.2d 180 (1994). State v. Lumpkin, 320 Or. 315, 882 P.2d 602 (1994). We The facts of this case are adequately stated in our previous opinion and are only briefly summarized here. After Offi......