State v. Maddox

Decision Date23 January 1900
Citation55 S.W. 72,153 Mo. 471
PartiesSTATE v. MADDOX.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from circuit court, Ralls county; John Megowan, Special Judge.

J. Morgan Maddox, convicted of robbery, appeals. Affirmed.

M. L. Farres, for appellant. Edward C. Crow, Atty. Gen., and Sam B. Jeffries, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

GANTT, P. J.

At the August term, 1897, of the circuit court of Ralls county the defendant was indicted for robbing Jacob Castator. He was duly arraigned, tried, convicted, and sentenced to the penitentiary for 22 years. He appeals to this court.

The indictment is sufficient, and the record proper without error. The facts are about as follows: Jacob Castator lived at Salt River toll gate, in Spencer township, Ralls county, Mo. He was toll-gate keeper at that place for the Hannibal & New London Gravel-Road Company. His dwelling house was situated about 120 yards from Salt River, on the road of said company, about 1½ miles north from New London. The house was on the east side of the road and the south side of the river. His family consisted of himself and wife. They were at home on the night of July 14, 1897. The house stood about 6 feet from the road and about 10 feet from the chain post on the east. On that night he and his wife occupied the southwest room, next to the road. The door to the house was about 15 feet from the post to which the chain hanging across the road was attached. About 11 o'clock on the night in question he was called from his bed by some one, whom he afterwards found to be on horseback. He got up and opened the screen door, when he saw the man on a horse, facing the chain. Thinking he wanted to pay toll, and pass in upon the gravel road, he called to him to wait a few minutes, and he would get up and let him through. On stepping out of the house, two men jumped from behind the post, and demanded that he throw up his hands. They exhibited revolvers, and he complied with their request. Defendant, Maddox, was recognized as one of the robbers. The three men bound his hands behind him, led him into the house, where they tied his feet together and threw him across the foot of the bed. They then bound the wife in like manner, and demanded the keys to the lock which fastened the chain across the road and the drawers to the bureau and trunks in his house. Defendant, Maddox, took them from Castator's hands, unlocked the chain across the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 cases
  • State v. Barrington
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 1 juin 1906
    ...been cited with approval on this question in State v. Steifel, 106 Mo. 129, 17 S. W. 227, and State v. Nettles, 153 Mo., loc. cit. 469, 55 S. W. 72. Burgess, J., in the latter case, speaking for this court upon this subject, correctly and very clearly states the true rule. It was thus state......
  • State v. Hascall
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 1 décembre 1920
    ... ... procedure. The statute (Sec. 5285, R. S. 1909) requires a ... motion for a new trial to be filed within four days after the ... verdict of the jury or the finding of the court. This we have ... uniformly held to be mandatory. [State v. Simenson, ... 263 Mo. 264, 172 S.W. 601; State v. Maddox, 153 Mo ... 471, 55 S.W. 72.] The supplemental motion for a new trial was ... not filed until more than thirty days after the return of the ... verdict. Errors assigned therein are therefore not so ... preserved as to authorize a review of same. [State v. Brooks, ... 92 Mo. 592.] ... ...
  • State v. Currier
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 12 février 1910
    ... ... its judicial discretion, this court will not interfere ... State v. Worten, 139 Mo. 533; State v ... Reed, 137 Mo. 134; State v. Dunn, 179 Mo. 95 ... (3) Motion for new trial must be filed before judgment. This ... is mandatory. Sec. 2689, R. S. 1899; State v ... Maddox, 153 Mo. 473; State v. Brooks, 92 Mo ... 591; State v. Pritchett, 219 Mo. 704; State v ... Rosenblatt, 185 Mo. 114; 1 Chitty's Crim. Law (5 ... Ed.), p. 663; Bishop's Crim. Pro. (1 Ed.), sec. 852. (4) ... This court cannot consider defendant's objection to the ... testimony of Stites on the ... ...
  • State v. Loyd
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 9 octobre 1950
    ...297 Mo. 219,226,226,248 S.W. 596, 598 [3] citing authorities; State v. Porter, Mo.Supp., 81 S.W.2d 316, 317 [1,2]; State v. Maddox, 153 Mo. 471, 473, 55 S.W. 72,73. Supplemental motions for new trial or amendments of motions for new trial filed after the lapse of said statutory time are lik......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT