State v. Malone, S--493
| Decision Date | 15 January 1974 |
| Docket Number | No. S--493,S--493 |
| Citation | 288 So.2d 549 |
| Parties | STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. James Curtis MALONE, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Donald Nichols, State's Atty., Richard G. Rumrell, Roger D. Merriam, Asst. State's Attys., and Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appellant.
Louis O. Frost, Jr., Public Defender, John Southwood, Chief Asst. Public Defender, and James O. Brecher, Asst. Public Defender, for appellee.
James Curtis Malone was charged in Duval County, Florida, with first degree murder in two counts. The information alleged in one count that he killed one Wilbur Jones by stabbing, striking and beating him to death with an ice pick and an axe. The other count charged that he killed one Blanche Jones by striking and beating her to death with an axe.
In due course, a search warrant was procured by the State for Malone's residence. Following its execution, Malone moved to suppress the evidence seized pursuant thereto on the ground that the affidavit upon which the warrant was based was insufficient. The trial court granted the motion and this appeal ensued.
The affidavit made in support of the warrant reads as follows:
'Affiant's reasons for belief are as follows:
The question presented for decision is whether the foregoing affidavit contains sufficient information to show probable cause for the issuance of the search warrant. Counsel for both parties are in agreement that Aquilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108, 84 S.Ct. 1509, 12 L.Ed.2d 723 (1964); and Spinelli v. United States, 393 U.S. 410, 89 S.Ct. 584, 21 L.Ed.2d 637 (1969), stand for the principle that an affidavit in support of a search warrant must contain information which is sufficient for the magistrate to determine probable cause. To be sufficient the affidavit must state Facts, not Conclusions. Both federal and state constitutions make the same demand--search warrants must be supported by affidavits which state sufficient facts to permit an impartial magistrate to determine whether probable cause exists. Florida Statutes, Section 933.18, F.S.A., provides a like requisite.
In its order of suppression, the trial court relied heavily on Gelis v. State, 249 So.2d 509 (Fla.App.1971), wherein the court held that the following affidavit (in material part) was insufficient to fulfill the legal requirement that it must state facts giving rise to probable cause or establishing the grounds for the application for a search warrant, viz:
'(The defendant) has been arrested for B&E and Grand Larceny of said personal property based on known incriminating facts and and (sic) evidence in possession of affiant, wearing apparrel (sic) and other evidence used in connection with the commission of said crime has not been recovered and is believed to be at above premises.'
The exact ruling of the Gelis court was that the affidavit did not 'set forth the facts on which such reason or belief is based.' (At page...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Swartz v. State
...warrant. Dumbra v. United States, 268 U.S. 435, 45 S.Ct. 546, 69 L.Ed. 1032.' (46 So.2d 874--875; Emphasis added) In State v. Malone, Fla.App.1st 1974, 288 So.2d 549, this Court considered an affidavit for a search warrant for the search of appellant's residence for stolen property which th......
-
Dufour v. State
...it was not arbitrary for the magistrate to make that determination. Bastida v. Henderson, 487 F.2d 860 (5th Cir.1973); State v. Malone, 288 So.2d 549 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974). Appellant next argues that the testimony of Richard Miller, a fellow inmate during his incarceration after the murder, s......
-
Younger v. State, 82-248
...sought to be searched, but need only have a reasonable ground to believe that such evidence is present. Swartz; State v. Malone, 288 So.2d 549 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974). Under the circumstances here, the affidavit, which established that two separate quantities of marijuana had been found in appe......
-
State v. Williams, 79-155
...exactitudes to establish probable cause but, rather, he may rely on probabilities based on his common sense deduction. State v. Malone, 288 So.2d 549 (Fla. 1st DCA 1974). Secondly, the failure to comply with a ministerial act, 2 required by statute in regard to a search warrant, will not in......