State v. Martin
Decision Date | 19 December 1921 |
Docket Number | 10782. |
Citation | 110 S.E. 78,118 S.C. 21 |
Parties | STATE v. MARTIN ET AL. |
Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Appeal from General Sessions Circuit Court of Richland County; W. H Townsend, Judge.
Heyward Martin and others were convicted of breaking into and stealing from a store, and appeal. Reversed.
Graydon & Graydon, of Columbia, for appellants.
A. F Spigener, Sol., of Columbia, for the State.
The case shows the following:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Baker
... ... For example, in State v. Hamilton, 138 S.C. 164, 136 S.E ... 391, relied on by appellant, Camel and Chesterfield ... cigarettes were found in defendant's possession, but ... there was no way to distinguish these from those stolen or ... other cigarettes of the same brands; in State v. Martin ... et al., 118 S.C. 21, 110 S.E. 78, lard and cakes were ... stolen, but neither had any distinguishing features ... It is ... next contended that the trial Judge erred in failing to ... charge the law governing circumstantial evidence. There was ... no request that he do ... ...
-
State v. Hamilton
... ... This defendant offered testimony to show that he ... ran a commissary for his employees, and a short while prior ... to the alleged robbery he had purchased large quantities of ... both Camel and Chesterfield cigarettes ... In the ... case of the State v. Martin, 118 S.C. 21, 110 S.E ... 78, it was held by this court: ... "That soon after a store was broken into and robbed, ... defendants were found in possession of goods similar to those ... taken, but which no one could swear to being those taken, is ... insufficient for conviction." (Syllabus.) ... ...