State v. Matheson
| Decision Date | 03 March 2005 |
| Docket Number | No. SC04-490.,SC04-490. |
| Citation | 896 So.2d 748 |
| Parties | STATE of Florida, Petitioner, v. Gary Alan MATHESON, Respondent. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, FL, Robert J. Krauss, Bureau Chief Criminal Appeals, and Susan M. Shanahan, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, FL, for Petitioner.
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Celene Humphries, Special Assistant Public Defender, Tenth Judicial Circuit, Bartow, FL, for Respondent.
We initially accepted jurisdiction pursuant to article V, section 3(b)(3), Florida Constitution, to review Matheson v. State, 870 So.2d 8 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), based on express and direct conflict with Vetter v. State, 395 So.2d 1199 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Upon further consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.
It is so ordered.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Frost v. State
...Frost relies on the first line of cases, which began with Matheson v. State, 870 So.2d 8 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), review dismissed, 896 So.2d 748 (Fla.2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 998, 126 S.Ct. 545, 163 L.Ed.2d 499 (2005). In Matheson, the Second District held that a dog's alert to the presenc......
-
Frost v. State Of Fla.
...Frost relies on the first line of cases, which began with Matheson v. State, 870 So. 2d 8 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), review dismissed, 896 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 998 (2005). In Matheson, the Second District held that a dog's alert to the presence of drugs may provide probab......
-
The Florida Bar v. Gross, No. SC01-1403
... ... See art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. For the reasons that follow, Lee Howard Gross is disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Florida, effective, nunc pro tunc, May 21, 2002 ... I. FACTS ... The Florida Bar filed four complaints against ... ...
-
Rehm v. State
...dog alert to vehicle); Matheson v. State, 870 So.2d 8 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), rev. granted, 880 So.2d 1212 (Fla.2004), rev. dismissed, 896 So.2d 748 (Fla.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 126 S.Ct. 545, 163 L.Ed.2d 499 (2005) (holding that a dog alert, standing alone, was not sufficient to establi......