State v. May

Decision Date17 March 1896
Citation24 S.E. 118,118 N.C. 1204
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesSTATE. v. MAY.

Criminal Law—Appeal—Insufficient Record.

Where an insufficient record is sent up, and it is not shown that appellant is free from laches, the appeal will be dismissed, unless a serious question is presented.

Appeal from superior court, Lenoir county; Graham, Judge.

Appeal by Stephen May from an order refusing an arrest of judgment on an alleged defect in the indictment. Dismissed.

The Attorney General, for the State.

CLARK, J. The transcript fails to show that the court was held by a judge at the time and place required by law; that a grand jury was drawn, sworn, and charged, and presented the indictment; and there are other defects. It is the duty of the appellant to have the record sent up, and, when it is in such condition as above stated, usually, the court will dismiss the appeal, unless it is shown that the appellant was guilty of no laches; otherwise, the appellant could always procure six months' delay by simply failing to have a sufficient record sent up. State v. McDowell, 93 N. C. 541; State v. Johnston, Id. 559. The court has sometimes not dismissed in such case, but never unless a serious question is presented, as in State v. Farrar, 103 N. C. 413, 9 S. E. 449, and cases cited But in the present case the only exception is for refusal to arrest the judgment on the allegation of a defect in the indictment, and, on inspection, there is no defect. Code, § 985, subsec. 6, has been amended by Act 1885, c. 66, repealing that part requiring an allegation of intent. State v. Rogers, 94 N. C. 860. Appeal dismissed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • State v. Stafford
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • November 30, 1932
    ...dismissed. State v. Golden, 203 N.C. 440, 166 S.E. 311. First, the transcript fails to show the organization of the court ( State v. May, 118 N.C. 1204, 24 S.E. 118), or the "court was held by a judge authorized *** to hold it, and at the place and time prescribed by law." State v. Butts, 9......
  • State v. Jenkins
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • September 19, 1951
    ...it was, without full incorporation of it therein, it may be doubted whether the case is properly before us for decision. State v. May, 118 N.C. 1204, 24 S.E. 118. On appeal in criminal cases, the indictment or warrant and plea on which the case is tried, the verdict and the judgment appeale......
  • State v. Stubbs, 248
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • October 13, 1965
    ...(in civil cases), sees proper to make such motion, unless sufficient excuse for the apparent laches is shown.' And again, in State v. May, 118 N.C. 1204, 24 S.E. 118: 'The transcript fails to show that the court was held by a judge at the time and place required by law, that a grand jury wa......
  • Frazier v. Piedmont & N. Ry. Co.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • December 23, 1931
    ... ... its holding by authorized judge at legal time and place ...          Civil ... action to recover damages for an alleged wrongful death, ... brought against Piedmont & Northern Railway Company, a ... corporation chartered under the laws of the state of South ... Carolina, and F. E. Williams, citizen and resident of ... Mecklenburg county, N. C ...          Motion ... by nonresident corporate defendant to remove cause to the ... District Court of the United States for the Western District ... of North Carolina for trial. Motion ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT