GARY
A. J.
This is
an application to the court in the exercise of its original
jurisdiction, for an order of injunction restraining the
respondent from ordering and holding an election in the
school district of Yorkville. The said school district was
incorporated by an act, entitled "An act to create the
school district of Yorkville, in York county, and enable it
to organize a system of free schools, and to levy a tax in
support of the same, and to purchase and hold property,"
approved 22d December, 1888. 20 St. at Large, p. 246. This
statute embraced an area of one mile, extending from the
intersection of Congress and Liberty streets. On the 15th of
February, 1907, an act was passed, entitled "An act to
enlarge the area of the school district of Yorkville to two
and one-half miles" (25 St. at Large, p. 731), which
provides: "That after the approval of this act, the
territory embraced within the area extending two and one-half
miles, from the intersection of Congress and Liberty streets
in the town of Yorkville, in said state, be declared a
separate school district, and to be known as the 'School
District of Yorkville,' and that it be invested with such
corporate powers as may be necessary to carry
out the purposes of its organization, as now declared by law
heretofore creating the same, and acts supplementary or
amendatory thereto."
The
petitioner alleges that this act is unconstitutional on the
following grounds, to wit: "(a) In that it is in
violation of and is repugnant to article 3, § 34, subds. 4
5, 11, of the Constitution of South Carolina. (1) The school
district of Yorkville, whose charter is hereby amended, is
not an educational institution under the control of the
state. (2) It is a new school district, the creation of which
is expressly prohibited. (3) A special law has been enacted
where a general law could have been made applicable. (b) In
that it is in violation of and repugnant to article 9, § 2
of the Constitution of South Carolina, in that the Yorkville
school district, the corporation whose charter has been
amended by said act of the General Assembly, is not one of
the excepted corporations enumerated in article 9, § 2, of
the Constitution, namely, 'such charitable, penal,
educational or reformatory corporations, as may be under the
control of the state,' but, on the contrary, is a
corporation whose charter cannot be amended by special law,
save only under the proviso to article 9, § 2, of the
Constitution, which provides 'that the General Assembly
may by a two-thirds vote of each house, on a concurrent
resolution, allow a bill for a special charter to be
introduced, and may pass the same as other bills'; but in
this connection petitioner avers and charges that no such
two-thirds vote of each house was taken on a concurrent
resolution allowing the introduction and passage of the bill
into the act herein assailed."
We
proceed to consider, first, the grounds upon which it is
contended the statute is obnoxious to certain provisions of
article 3, § 34, of the Constitution, which is as follows
"The General Assembly of this state shall not enact
local or special laws concerning any of the
following subjects, or for any of the following purposes, to
wit: (1) To change the names of persons or places. (2) To lay
out, open, alter or work roads or highways. (3) To
incorporate cities, towns or villages, or change, amend or
extend the charter thereof. (4) To incorporate educational,
religious, charitable, social, manufacturing or banking
institutions not under control of the state, or amend the
charters thereof. (5) To incorporate school districts. (6) To
authorize the adoption or legitimation of children. (7) To
provide for the protection of game. (8) To summon and empanel
grand or petit jurors. (9) To provide for the age at which
citizens shall be subject to road or other public duty. (10)
To fix the amount or manner of compensation to be paid to any
county officer, except that the laws may be
so made as to grade the compensation in proportion to the
population and necessary service...