State v. McCoy
Decision Date | 07 May 1901 |
Citation | 62 S.W. 991,162 Mo. 383 |
Parties | STATE v. McCOY et al. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from circuit court, Wright county; Argus Cox, Judge.
Frank McCoy and others were convicted of arson, and they appeal. Affirmed.
E. H. Farnsworth, for appellants. The Attorney General, for the State.
Arson in the third degree is charged in the indictment in this language: The evidence showed that the defendants, together with four other men, were in a building, 14 by 16 feet square, built of 2 by 4 scantling laid down and spiked together, and used as a county jail, in Hartville, Mo.; that the defendants were charged with burglary and larceny; that in the jail was a stove, with a fire in it, and a shovel and a piece of iron bar that had been used by workmen in fixing a window; that, while one of the defendants watched at the window, the remaining three took turn about in heating the iron bar and placing it against the 2 by 4 scantling, charring and burning the same, and that they kept up this operation until they burned a scantling in two, and then by taking hold of it they were enabled to pull it from its place in the ceiling, and thus make an opening in the roof about 8 inches wide and 18 or 20 inches in length out of which the defendants escaped. The defendants were tried, and the jury returned the following verdict: The defendants filed motions for new trial and in arrest of judgment, which were denied, and then appealed to this court. They rely upon the insufficiency of the indictment: First, because it does not charge that the building was burned and consumed; second, because it does not charge that the building was willfully set on fire by the defendants, with the intent to burn and consume the same; and, third, because the indictment does not charge that the crime was committed maliciously. The defendants' counsel, by instructions, raised the question that if the defendants, or either of them, burned a hole through the building mentioned in the indictment only for the purpose of escaping therefrom, and not for the purpose or with the intent of burning and consuming said building, then the defendant or defendants were not guilty of arson. The court refused to give this instruction, and the defendants excepted to the ruling of the court. No testimony was introduced on behalf of defendants, nor are they represented in this court.
Section 1875, Rev. St. 1899, under which the indictment is drawn, reads this way: "Every person who shall willfully set fire to or burn any house, building, barn, stable, boat or vessel of another, or any office or depot or railroad car of any railroad company, or any house of public worship, college, academy or school house, or building used as such, or any public building belonging to the United States or this state, or to any county, city, town or...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Ferguson
... ... particular reference to offenses created by statute, its ... application in determining whether a criminal charge conforms ... to the statute can only be properly invoked where the offense ... is fully and clearly defined by the statute. [State v. McCoy, ... 162 Mo. 383, 62 S.W. 991.] That murder in the first degree is ... defined by statute in so far as it designates the particular ... homicides which constitute this grade of offense, it must be ... admitted, but in such classification, it does not attempt to ... set forth all of the ... ...
-
State v. Ferguson
...conforms to the statute can only be properly invoked where the offense is fully and clearly defined by the statute (State v. McCoy, 162 Mo. loc. cit. 389, 62 S. W. 991). That murder in the first degree is defined by statute, in so far as it designates the particular homicides which constitu......
-
State v. Witham
...the offense was committed; hence the' crime was not arson in the first degree, as defined by section 3282, R. S. 1919. In State v. McCoy, 62 S. W. 991, 162 Mo. 383, the defendants were confined in a jail, the walls of which were made of two by four scantlings. They heated a bar of iron, and......
-
State v. Witham
... ... third degree.' ... There ... was no human being in Mrs. Long's house at the time the ... offense was committed; hence the crime was not arson in the ... first degree, as defined by section 3282, R. S. 1919 ... In ... State v. McCoy, 62 S.W. 991, 162 Mo. 383, the defendants were ... confined in a jail, the walls of which were made of two by ... four scantlings. They heated a bar of iron, and charred and ... burned a hole through the wall of scantlings by means of the ... hot iron. Their conviction was sustained. Judge ... ...