State v. McCoy

Decision Date07 May 1901
Citation62 S.W. 991,162 Mo. 383
PartiesSTATE v. McCOY et al.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from circuit court, Wright county; Argus Cox, Judge.

Frank McCoy and others were convicted of arson, and they appeal. Affirmed.

E. H. Farnsworth, for appellants. The Attorney General, for the State.

SHERWOOD, P. J.

Arson in the third degree is charged in the indictment in this language: "That at said county of Wright, in the state of Missouri, on or about the 15th day of February, A. D. 1900, Frank McCoy, Pink Walker, James Bolton, and Al Ferguson did then and there willfully and feloniously set fire to and burn a public building belonging to said county of Wright, in the state of Missouri, not the subject of arson in the first or second degree, to wit, the jail of said county, situate in the town of Hartville, in said county, against the peace and dignity of the state. Thomas M. Musick, Asst. Pros. Atty." The evidence showed that the defendants, together with four other men, were in a building, 14 by 16 feet square, built of 2 by 4 scantling laid down and spiked together, and used as a county jail, in Hartville, Mo.; that the defendants were charged with burglary and larceny; that in the jail was a stove, with a fire in it, and a shovel and a piece of iron bar that had been used by workmen in fixing a window; that, while one of the defendants watched at the window, the remaining three took turn about in heating the iron bar and placing it against the 2 by 4 scantling, charring and burning the same, and that they kept up this operation until they burned a scantling in two, and then by taking hold of it they were enabled to pull it from its place in the ceiling, and thus make an opening in the roof about 8 inches wide and 18 or 20 inches in length out of which the defendants escaped. The defendants were tried, and the jury returned the following verdict: "We, the jury, find the defendants all guilty as charged in the indictment, and assess the penalty at five years each in the penitentiary. C. P. Mingus, Foreman." The defendants filed motions for new trial and in arrest of judgment, which were denied, and then appealed to this court. They rely upon the insufficiency of the indictment: First, because it does not charge that the building was burned and consumed; second, because it does not charge that the building was willfully set on fire by the defendants, with the intent to burn and consume the same; and, third, because the indictment does not charge that the crime was committed maliciously. The defendants' counsel, by instructions, raised the question that if the defendants, or either of them, burned a hole through the building mentioned in the indictment only for the purpose of escaping therefrom, and not for the purpose or with the intent of burning and consuming said building, then the defendant or defendants were not guilty of arson. The court refused to give this instruction, and the defendants excepted to the ruling of the court. No testimony was introduced on behalf of defendants, nor are they represented in this court.

Section 1875, Rev. St. 1899, under which the indictment is drawn, reads this way: "Every person who shall willfully set fire to or burn any house, building, barn, stable, boat or vessel of another, or any office or depot or railroad car of any railroad company, or any house of public worship, college, academy or school house, or building used as such, or any public building belonging to the United States or this state, or to any county, city, town or...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • State v. Ferguson
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 16 Mayo 1919
    ... ... particular reference to offenses created by statute, its ... application in determining whether a criminal charge conforms ... to the statute can only be properly invoked where the offense ... is fully and clearly defined by the statute. [State v. McCoy, ... 162 Mo. 383, 62 S.W. 991.] That murder in the first degree is ... defined by statute in so far as it designates the particular ... homicides which constitute this grade of offense, it must be ... admitted, but in such classification, it does not attempt to ... set forth all of the ... ...
  • State v. Ferguson
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 16 Mayo 1919
    ...conforms to the statute can only be properly invoked where the offense is fully and clearly defined by the statute (State v. McCoy, 162 Mo. loc. cit. 389, 62 S. W. 991). That murder in the first degree is defined by statute, in so far as it designates the particular homicides which constitu......
  • State v. Witham
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 26 Febrero 1926
    ...the offense was committed; hence the' crime was not arson in the first degree, as defined by section 3282, R. S. 1919. In State v. McCoy, 62 S. W. 991, 162 Mo. 383, the defendants were confined in a jail, the walls of which were made of two by four scantlings. They heated a bar of iron, and......
  • State v. Witham
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 26 Febrero 1926
    ... ... third degree.' ...          There ... was no human being in Mrs. Long's house at the time the ... offense was committed; hence the crime was not arson in the ... first degree, as defined by section 3282, R. S. 1919 ...          In ... State v. McCoy, 62 S.W. 991, 162 Mo. 383, the defendants were ... confined in a jail, the walls of which were made of two by ... four scantlings. They heated a bar of iron, and charred and ... burned a hole through the wall of scantlings by means of the ... hot iron. Their conviction was sustained. Judge ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT