State v. Medley

Decision Date29 October 1919
Docket Number347.
Citation100 S.E. 591,178 N.C. 710
PartiesSTATE v. MEDLEY ET AL.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Appeal from Superior Court, Forsyth County; Bryson, Judge.

Bunks Medley and Fannie Robertson were convicted of highway robbery. From a judgment imposing sentence on Bunks Medley he excepts and appeals. No error.

Indictment for highway robbery, in feloniously taking by force a watch etc., from the person of one G. M. Simpson, with count also for feloniously receiving said watch, etc. There was a verdict of guilty as to both defendants, with recommendation of mercy as to Fannie Robertson.

While ordinarily desirable that a defendant in a criminal prosecution, requested to testify by a codefendant, should be called to the stand to determine witness' constitutional privilege against giving testimony that might incriminate herself, where the facts showed that the evidence sought must prejudice such witness' defense, and as well incriminate the witness with reference to another crime the court's refusal to have the witness called to the stand must be sustained.

Moses Shapiro and Fred M. Parrish, both of Winston-Salem, for appellant.

Jas. S Manning, Atty. Gen., and Frank Nash, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

HOKE J.

There were facts in evidence tending to show that in March, 1919 about 12 o'clock at night, or shortly thereafter, on the streets of Winston-Salem, the defendant Bunks Medley held up the prosecutor with a pistol, while the female defendant went through his pockets, taking his watch, etc. There were other facts tending to confirm the direct evidence on the subject.

During the progress of the trial, the male defendant proposed to examine his codefendant, Fannie Robertson, as a witness, stating that his purpose was to show by her that he was not with her that night, and had not been for two months, and that the watch which she had in her possession (that of the prosecutor) had been found in the bed which had been occupied by her and the prosecutor, Simpson. Said Fannie Robertson having stated that she did not care to take the stand as a witness, the court declined to allow her to be examined as proposed, and defendant excepted. Speaking generally, and under section 1630 of Revisal, all parties and persons interested are made competent and compellable to testify as witnesses in judicial investigations, or before courts or tribunals having power to hear and examine evidence, except in actions or other proceedings instituted on account of adultery or in actions for criminal conversation.

Under section 1634, in all indictments, complaints, or other proceedings against persons charged with crimes, etc., the person so charged shall at his own request, and not otherwise, be a competent witness, etc.; and in section 1635 it is provided that nothing in the preceding section (1634) shall render...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • State v. Howard
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • November 25, 1942
    ... ... Chap. 4, Public Laws 1871-1872. So that at the time of the ... trial of this case there was no statute or rule of evidence ... that would require the exclusion of the testimony of Sneed, ... if in other respects competent. State v. Smith, 86 ... N.C. 705; State v. Medley, 178 N.C. 710, 100 S.E ... 591; State v. Bittings, 206 N.C. 798, 175 S.E. 299; ... State v. Perry, 210 N.C. 796, 188 S.E. 639; C.S. § ...           2. The ... defendant assigns error in the denial of his motion for ... judgment as of nonsuit, but an examination of the record ... ...
  • State v. Perry
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • December 16, 1936
    ... ... competent and compellable to testify for or against a ... codefendant, provided he is not compellable to give evidence ... that may tend to convict him, either of the crime charged or ... other offense against the criminal law, State v ... Medley, 178 N.C. 710, 100 S.E. 591; State v ... Smith, 86 N.C. 705, it is part of the express or implied ... understanding that an accomplice admitted to testify for the ... prosecution shall tell all he knows, State v. Lyon, ... 81 N.C. 600, 31 Am.Rep. 518, and he cannot refuse to answer a ... ...
  • State v. Norton
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • December 16, 1942
    ... ... Furthermore, ordinarily, a defendant in a criminal action is ... competent and compellable to testify for or against a ... codefendant, provided his testimony does not incriminate ... himself. State v. Smith, 86 N.C. 705; State v ... Weaver, 93 N.C. 595, 596; State v. Medley, 178 ... N.C. 710, 100 S.E. 591; State v. Perry, 210 N.C ... 796, 188 S.E. 639 ...          Moreover, ... in the present case not only did the co-defendant of ... appellant testify, but others not interested in the event of ... the action testified against him ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT