State v. Meyer
| Decision Date | 31 October 1876 |
| Citation | State v. Meyer, 64 Mo. 190 (Mo. 1876) |
| Parties | STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. PETER MEYER, Appellant. |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Barton County Circuit Court.
Wm. H. Phelps, for Appellant.
J. A. Hockaday, Att'y Gen'l, for Respondent.
The defendant was indicted under § 1, (Wagn. Stat. 247,) for carrying on the business of a dealer in exchange, etc., without license therefor, and on trial had, he was convicted.
For the reason that the evidence adduced at the trial does not show in what county the alleged offense was committed, the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.
All the other judges concur.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
19 cases
-
The State v. Murray
...of a demurrer to the evidence on behalf of defendants at the close of the State's case in chief. State v. Hartnett, 75 Mo. 251; State v. Meyer, 64 Mo. 190; State Hughes, 71 Mo. 633; State v. McGrath, 73 Mo. 181; State v. Inman, 76 Mo. 548; State v. Britton, 80 Mo. 60; State v. Young, 99 Mo.......
-
State v. McKenzie
...the evidence adduced at the trial does not show in what county the alleged offense was committed, the judgment must be reversed. State v. Meyer, 64 Mo. 190; v. Miller, 71 Mo. 89; State v. Hughes, 71 Mo. 633; State v. McGrath, 73 Mo. 182; State v. McGinnis, 74 Mo. 245; State v. Hartnett, 75 ......
-
State v. Kenyon
...cannot stand for the reason there was no sufficient proof of the cause. State v. Hughes, 71 Mo. 633; State v. Miller, 71 Mo. 89; State v. Meyer, 64 Mo. 190. (3) The record to show that the verdict was rendered by the twelve men paneled to try the cause, or that they were all in court at the......
- State v. Anderson
Get Started for Free