State v. Moore, Criminal 839

Decision Date16 June 1936
Docket NumberCriminal 839
Citation58 P.2d 752,48 Ariz. 16
PartiesSTATE OF ARIZONA, Appellant, v. BOB MOORE, Respondent
CourtArizona Supreme Court

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Maricopa. M. T. Phelps, Judge. Appeal dismissed.

Mr. F H. Lyman and Mr. James E. Nelson, for Appellant.

Messrs Baker & Whitney and Mr. Lawrence L. Howe, for Respondent.

OPINION

ROSS, J.

Respondent was convicted in the city magistrate's court upon two separate complaints charging him with the violation of an ordinance of the city of Phoenix making it a misdemeanor to engage in the business of receiving, making or negotiating bets on horse races at tracks in or out of Arizona. He appealed to the superior court of Maricopa county, and that court sustained his demurrers to the complaints and dismissed the cases.

The city attorney of Phoenix has appealed on behalf of the state assigning the court's ruling on the demurrers and the orders of dismissal as error. The cases were consolidated for the purposes of the appeal.

While the questions raised and argued by counsel are very interesting, we cannot consider nor decide them, for the reason that the case is not under the statutes appealable. The right of appeal from the superior court to the Supreme Court of the state, where the case originates in a justice, police, or recorder's court, is not granted to the state, but to the defendant only. The statute so stating is section 5137, Revised Code of 1928, reading as follows:

"§ 5137. Cases appealed to superior court reviewable by supreme court. An appeal may be taken by the defendant from a final judgment of the superior court in a case appealed from a justice, police or recorder's court if the action involves the validity of a tax, impost, assessment, toll, municipal fine or statute. Except as provided in this section there shall be no appeal from the judgment of the superior court rendered in a case appealed from a justice, police or recorder's court."

It will be noted that this section, after granting the right of appeal to a defendant, goes on to say that there shall be no appeal except the ones granted. The only cases in which the state may appeal are those prosecuted by indictment or information, as enumerated in section 5136, Id., reading as follows:

"§ 5136. Appeal by state, orders reviewable. An appeal may be taken by the state from an order setting aside, or sustaining a demurrer to an indictment or information; from an order granting a new trial, or arresting judgment, or from an order made after judgment affecting the substantial rights of the state...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • State v. Hansen
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • March 10, 2015
    ...express legislative authority” to the contrary. State v. Dawson, 164 Ariz. 278, 280, 792 P.2d 741, 743 (1990) ; see State v. Moore, 48 Ariz. 16, 18, 58 P.2d 752, 752 (1936) (noting “right of appeal in criminal cases is not known to the common law”). ¶ 6 The state identifies § 13–4032(2) as ......
  • State ex rel. Nelson v. Jordan, 9480
    • United States
    • Arizona Supreme Court
    • February 6, 1969
    ...counter to this Court's own attitude that even the right of appeal exists only by force of the Constitution and statutes, State v. Moore, 48 Ariz. 16, 58 P.2d 752; State ex rel. Murphy v. Superior Court of Arizona in and for Pinal County, 25 Ariz. 226, 234, 215 P. 538, and in the absence of......
  • State v. Phelps, 5062
    • United States
    • Arizona Supreme Court
    • May 17, 1948
    ... ... Maricopa, to direct respondent to proceed with the trial of a ... specified criminal cause wherein an alternative writ was ... Alternative writ quashed ... Board of ... Supervisors, 2 Ariz. 248, 12 P. 730; Graham v ... Moore, 56 Ariz. 106, 105 P.2d 962; Dey v ... McAlister, 19 Ariz. 306, 169 P. 458; State v ... Valdez, ... ...
  • State v. Spitz
    • United States
    • Arizona Court of Appeals
    • July 21, 1971
    ...case was prosecuted by Complaint. The Arizona Supreme Court has ruled on the exact contention now urged by the State. In State v. Moore, 48 Ariz. 16, 58 P.2d 752 (1936), in dismissing a purported appeal by the State, the court 'It will be noted that this section, (Section 5137, Revised Code......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT