State v. Morrow, 40109
| Decision Date | 23 October 1975 |
| Docket Number | No. 40109,40109 |
| Citation | 194 Neb. 591,234 N.W.2d 211 |
| Parties | STATE of Nebraska, Appellee, v. Curtis Dale MORROW, Appellant. |
| Court | Nebraska Supreme Court |
Michael C. Washburn, Leahy, Washburn & Cavanaugh, Omaha, for appellant.
Paul L. Douglas, Atty. Gen., Terry R. Schaaf, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., Lincoln, for appellee.
Heard before WHITE, C.J., and SPENCER, BOSLAUGH, McCOWN, NEWTON, CLINTON and BRODKEY, JJ.
Defendant, following a plea bargain, entered a plea of guilty to a charge of robbery. He received a sentence of 3 to 5 years imprisonment. He asserts on appeal that other charges pending against him should not have been considered by the trial court in fixing sentence and that the sentence is excessive. Examination of the record fails to disclose abuse of discretion. The appeal is frivolous and the judgment is affirmed.
See Rule 20; State v. Orner, 192 Neb. 523, 222 N.W.2d 819; State v. Welton, 190 Neb. 600, 210 N.W.2d 925.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Morrow v. Parratt
...the sentence was excessive. The Nebraska Supreme Court found the appeal to be frivolous and affirmed the judgment. State v. Morrow, 194 Neb. 591, 234 N.W.2d 211 (1975). Morrow then pursued a state post-conviction action in which he essentially contended that he was denied effective assistan......
- State v. Wilson, 40099
-
State v. Morrow
...He was represented by appointed counsel. The conviction and sentence on that guilty plea was affirmed by this court in State v. Morrow, 194 Neb. 591, 234 N.W.2d 211. Defendant essentially contends that he was denied effective assistance of counsel because his counsel was aware of a potentia......