State v. Munoz, 183P01.

Decision Date03 May 2001
Docket NumberNo. 183P01.,183P01.
Citation353 N.C. 454,548 S.E.2d 534
PartiesSTATE of North Carolina v. Victor Manuel MUNOZ.
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court

Victor Manuel Munoz, Pro Se.

Douglas A. Johnston, Special Deputy Attorney General, Horace M. Kimel, Jr., District Attorney, for State.

Prior report: 141 N.C.App. 675, 541 S.E.2d 218.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant Pro Se in this matter for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of May 2001."

Justice EDMUNDS recused.

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 cases
  • State Of North Carolina v. Blackwell
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • December 7, 2010
    ...N.C. App. 574, 576-77, 551 S.E.2d 147, 149 (2001)(citing State v. Munoz, 141 N.C. App. 675, 541 S.E.2d 218, 222, cert, denied, 353 N.C. 454, 548 S.E.2d 534 (2001)); see also, State v. Wilson, 155 N.C. App 89, 93-94, 574 S.E.2d 93, 97 (2002) (stating that "'a trial court's conclusions of law......
  • State v. McNeil, COA17-1404
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • November 20, 2018
    ...94, 97, 555 S.E.2d 294, 297 (2001) (citing State v. Munoz , 141 N.C.App. 675, 682, 541 S.E.2d 218, 222, cert. denied , 353 N.C. 454, 548 S.E.2d 534 (2001) ). However, where the trial court has not made findings of fact, "[i]f there is no conflict in the evidence on a fact, failure to find t......
  • State v. Hernandez
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • May 17, 2005
    ...must consider the totality of the circumstances. State v. Munoz, 141 N.C.App. 675, 682, 541 S.E.2d 218, 222, cert. denied, 353 N.C. 454, 548 S.E.2d 534 (2001). Facts giving rise to a reasonable suspicion include nervousness, sweating, failing to make eye contact, conflicting statements, and......
  • State v. Tucker
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • February 4, 2003
    ...307 N.C. 62, 67, 296 S.E.2d 649, 652 (1982); State v. Munoz, 141 N.C.App. 675, 682, 541 S.E.2d 218, 222,cert. denied,353 N.C. 454, 548 S.E.2d 534 (2001). Evidence is to be viewed in the light most favorable to the State. State v. Pierce, 346 N.C. 471, 491, 488 S.E.2d 576, 588 (1997). All co......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT