State v. Neitzel

Decision Date21 August 1912
PartiesSTATE v. NEITZEL.
CourtWashington Supreme Court

Department 2. Appeal from Superior Court, Spokane County; E. H Sullivan, Judge.

F. F Neitzel was convicted of vagrancy, and he appeals. Affirmed.

Crandell & Crandell, for appellant.

Jno. L Wiley, Robt. L. McWilliams, and Geo. R. Lovejoy, all of Seattle, for the State.

MOUNT J.

The defendant was convicted for vagrancy under a statute which provides: 'Every person who asks or receives any compensation, gratuity or reward for practicing fortune telling, palmistry or clairvoyance * * * is a vagrant.' Rem. & Bal. Code, § 2688. He has appealed from a judgment based upon the verdict of a jury. The evidence shows that the prosecuting witness was a police officer in the city of Spokane. He went to the defendant's office and requested the defendant to tell his fortune. The defendant replied that he could not tell his fortune, but that he could 'figure it out,' and that his charges therefor would be one dollar. The defendant then, after inquiring the date of birth of the witness, proceeded to make some figures upon a diagram or horoscope, and then explained to the witness that these figures indicated past and future events in his life, which the defendant proceeded to tell to the prosecuting witness for which the witness paid to the defendant the sum demanded. In defense counsel sought to show that astrology is a science, and that the chart or horoscope made by the defendant was correct and in harmony with the principles of astrology. The court denied this offer, for the reason that the statute prohibits fortune telling, and that it was therefore unimportant that the means of telling fortunes was based upon a science. In his brief counsel for defendant states that the 'vocation of the defendant was casting horoscopes, drafting a map of the heavens at the time of one's birth, and the interpretation of horoscopes by tracing the movements of the planets to ascertain their relative positions at a given date, the aspects resulting therefrom, and their influences upon life.' He then proceeds to argue and cite authorities to the effect that the right to pursue a lawful calling is a constitutional right, which cannot be invaded. The authorities cited are not in point, because the statute makes fortune telling for compensation unlawful, regardless of the means employed. It is plain that the defendant was engaged in fortune...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Minersville School Dist. v. Gobitis
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Third Circuit
    • March 4, 1940
    ...McMasters v. State, 21 Okl.Cr. 318, 207 P. 566, 29 A.L.R. 292 (Spiritualism — exorcisement of evil spirits); State v. Neitzel, 69 Wash. 567, 125 P. 939, 43 L.R.A.,N.S., 203, Ann.Cas.1914A, 899 (astrology). Reverence is manifestly something deeper than law. The mere creation by fiat of a par......
  • People v. Woody
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • December 6, 1963
    ...fortune telling although done by the minister of a particular religious sect as a religious practice. (State v. Neitzel, 69 Wash. 567, 125 P. 939, 43 L.R.A.,N.S., 203.) The defendants contend that there is no grave and immediate danger attendant upon possession of peyote for ceremonial use ......
  • State v. Sheep
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • January 26, 1926
    ...civil government, or which are made criminal by the law of the land. 6 R. C. L. 251. To the same effect see State v. Neitzel, 125 P. 939, 69 Wash. 567, 43 L. R. A. (N. S.) 203, Ann. Cas. 1914A, 899. For the reasons foregoing the judgment and order are reversed, and the cause is remanded to ......
  • Bartha, In re
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • November 10, 1976
    ...of Birmingham, 222 Ala. 389, 133 So. 13, 14 (1931); Davis v. State, 118 Ohio St. 25, 160 N.E. 473, 474--475 (1928); State v. Neitzel, 69 Wash. 567, 125 P. 939, 940 (1912); Turner v. Kansas City, 354 Mo. 857, 191 S.W.2d 612, 617 (1945); McMasters v. State, 21 Okla.Crim. 318, 207 P. 566, 569,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT