State v. Nickels

Decision Date05 June 2019
Docket NumberNo. 96943-4,96943-4
Citation193 Wash.2d 1012,441 P.3d 1201 (Table)
CourtWashington Supreme Court
Parties STATE of Washington, Petitioner, v. David Emerson NICKELS, Respondent.
ORDER

¶1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its June 4, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶3 That the petition for review is granted. Any party may serve and file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of this order, see RAP 13.7(d).

 For the Court /s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • State v. Nickels
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • January 30, 2020
    ..."extraordinary circumstances" test. Id. at 497, 501, 434 P.3d 535. The State sought our review, which was granted. State v. Nickels, 193 Wash.2d 1012, 441 P.3d 1201 (2019).ISSUE¶5 Does Stenger remain good law, presumptively requiring the disqualification of an entire prosecutor’s office whe......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT