State v. Nixon, 73-1223

Decision Date28 May 1974
Docket NumberNo. 73-1223,73-1223
PartiesThe STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Edward Robinson NIXON, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Richard E. Gerstein, State's Atty., and John Lipinski, Asst. State's Atty., for appellant.

Phillip A. Hubbart, Public Defender, and Linnea Snyder, Asst. Public Defender, for appellee.

Before PEARSON, CARROLL and HAVERFIELD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is by the state from an order dismissing an information which charged the appellee with aggravated assault, in violation of § 784.04 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. 1

The information alleged 'that Edward Robinson Nixon on the 28th day of July 1973, in the County and State aforesaid (Dade County, Florida), did unlawfully and feloneously, without intent to kill, make an assault in and upon one David white, with a certain deadly weapon, to-wit: a knife, in violation of 784.04 Florida Statutes, (F.S.A.).'

The information tracked the statute. The essentials of the offense were alleged in the statutory language. It was sufficient. See Smith v. State, 1916, 72 Fla. 449, 73 So. 354; McGuire v. State, 1932, 106 Fla. 934, 143 So. 766; State v. Bruno, Fla.1958, 107 So.2d 9.

The order granting the defendant's motion to dismiss the information did not state grounds upon which it was based. The appellee contends the information was insufficient because the 'deadly weapon' therein referred to was a knife, and points to the fact that in Chapter 790 Fla.Stat., F.S.A. in which it is provided that carrying a concealed weapon on or about one's person is a misdemeanor of the first degree, in § 790.001(13) thereof firearms and common pocket knives are excepted from the definition of 'weapon.' Elsewhere in the statute there is an express provision making it a crime to carry a concealed firearm on or about the person. Obviously the legislature, by excepting common pocket knives from the category of weapons, the carrying of which would be a crime, did so in order that the carrying of a common pocket knife by a citizen should not constitute a crime, in view of the general custom of people to carry such knives for convenience and useful purposes unrelated to any criminal intent or activity.

But that does not mean that a pocket knife cannot be a deadly weapon. Whether an object used as a weapon in an assault is a deadly weapon is a factual question to be resolved by the finder of facts at trial (Bass v. State, Fla.App.1970, 232 So.2d 25), and is to be determined upon consideration of its likelihood to produce death or great bodily injury. Dey v. State, Fla.App.1966, 182 So.2d 266; Forchion v. State, Fla.App.1968, 214 So.2d 751. It is common knowledge that in certain circles pocket knives are used by assailants with deadly...

To continue reading

Request your trial
20 cases
  • Bunkley v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • May 27, 2004
    ...of people to carry such knives for convenience and useful purposes unrelated to any criminal intent or activity. State v. Nixon, 295 So.2d 121, 122 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974); see also L.B. v, State, 681 So.2d 1179, 1180 (Fla. 2d DCA B. Relevant Facts of L.B. and Bunkley Due process requires that t......
  • Robinson v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Florida
    • February 6, 2020
    ...and is to be determined upon consideration of its likelihood to produce death or great bodily injury.") (quoting Nixon v. State, 295 So. 2d 121, 122 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)); J.L. v. State, 60 So. 3d 462, 464-65 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (noting that "[w]hether a weapon is a deadly weapon is a questio......
  • Hodge v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • September 17, 1975
    ...251 P. 222 (1927); Highley v. People, 65 Colo. 497, 177 P. 975 (1919); Hamilton v. People, 24 Colo. 301, 51 P. 425 (1897); State v. Nixon, 295 So.2d 121 (Fla.App.1974); Sellars v. State, 113 Ga.App. 510, 149 S.E.2d 158 (1966); State v. McKeehan, 91 Idaho 808, 430 P.2d 886 (1967); People v. ......
  • Pope v. Sec'y
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Florida
    • January 30, 2015
    ...a violation of Section 812.13(2)(b) has occurred. [See Gust v. State of Florida, 558 So. 2d 450 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) and State v. Nixon, 295 So. 2d 121 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1974)] Florida Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases defines "weapon" as "any object that could be used to cause death ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT