State v. Norman
| Decision Date | 27 August 2009 |
| Docket Number | No. 232P09.,232P09. |
| Citation | 363 N.C. 587,683 S.E.2d 382 |
| Parties | STATE of North Carolina v. Vandel NORMAN. |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 4th of June 2009 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 27th of August 2009."
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
State v. Corbett
...determination of the admissibility of hearsay statements pursuant to Rule 803(4) is reviewed de novo on appeal. State v. Norman , 196 N.C. App. 779, 783, 675 S.E.2d 395, 399, disc. review denied , 363 N.C. 587, 683 S.E.2d 382 (2009). In order to satisfy the first prong of the Hinnant test—t......
-
State v. McNeill
...penetration, such as bruising or tearing, is required to support" a conviction for first-degree sexual offense); State v. Norman , 196 N.C. App. 779, 782, 675 S.E.2d 395, 398 (in which an expert explained that the absence of anal damage does not mean sexual assault did not occur "because th......
-
State v. Carter
...57286, the State was required to offer evidence tending to show that Defendant's penis penetrated Vanessa's anus. State v. Norman, 196 N.C.App. 779, 786, 675 S.E.2d 395, 400, disc. review denied, 363 N.C. 587, 683 S.E.2d 382 (2009). The record contains contradictory evidence concerning the ......
-
State v. Zeiglar, No. COA09-814 (N.C. App. 2/2/2010)
...testimony that "defendant stuck his private parts `up [her] butt'" was sufficient evidence of anal intercourse); State v. Norman, __ N.C. App. __, __, 675 S.E.2d 395, 401 (finding sufficient evidence of anal intercourse where minor victim testified that "[d]efendant `[stuck] his ding-a-ling......