State v. North

Decision Date18 June 1888
CitationState v. North, 8 S.W. 799, 95 Mo. 615 (Mo. 1888)
PartiesSTATE v. NORTH.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from St. Louis criminal court; JAMES C. NORMILE, Judge.

Indictment of George North for burglary and larceny. Judgment of conviction, and defendant appeals.

Thos. B. Harvey and Thos. B. Estep, for appellant. B. G. Boone, Atty. Gen., for the State.

NORTON, C. J.

Defendant was indicted in the criminal court of the city of St. Louis, and charged with burglary and larceny, and on trial was convicted of both burglary and larceny, and his punishment assessed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for five years. The evidence on the part of the state tended to show that on the same day the offense charged was committed, and the day after it was committed, defendant was found in possession of goods stolen at the time the burglary was committed, and that he admitted he took them. The evidence of defendant himself, and that of another witness, tended to show an alibi at the time the burglary and larceny were committed. On this state of the evidence, the court gave the following instruction: "And where property has been stolen by means of a burglary, proven beyond a reasonable doubt, and recently thereafter the same or any part thereof is found in possession of another, if he fails to account for such possession in a manner consistent with his innocence, such person is presumed to be a thief, and is also...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • State v. North
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • June 18, 1888
  • State v. Walker
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • March 6, 1906
    ...is not comprehensive enough under the decisions of this court in State v. Kelly, 73 Mo. 608; State v. Sidney, 74 Mo. 390; State v. North, 95 Mo. 615, 8 S. W. 799, and if the instruction stood alone and had not been supplemented by instruction No. 6, which fully covered the defense of alibi,......
  • The State v. Wright
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • November 20, 1906
    ...good character. State v. Bruin, 34 Mo. 541; State v. Kelley, 73 Mo. 608; State v. Sidney, 74 Mo. 390; State v. Crank, 75 Mo. 406; State v. North, 95 Mo. 615; State v. Walker, 194 253. Herbert S. Hadley, Attorney-General, and N. T. Gentry, Assistant Attorney-General, for the State. The State......
  • State v. Crooke
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • February 17, 1908
    ...of law can find no place in a case where other evidence shows the accused not to be guilty. State v. Sidney, 74 Mo. 390; State v. North, 95 Mo. 615, 8 S. W. 799; State v. Walker, 194 Mo. 253, 92 S. W. 659. That the evidence does so show in this case we proceed to demonstrate. If the harness......
  • Get Started for Free