State v. Owens
| Decision Date | 28 September 1995 |
| Citation | 665 A.2d 609,235 Conn. 912 |
| Court | Connecticut Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE of Connecticut v. Andrew OWENS. |
Michael J. Isko, Assistant Public Defender, in support of the petition.
Carolyn J. Longstreth, Assistant State's Attorney, in opposition.
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 38 Conn.App. 801, 663 A.2d 1094 (AC 13584), is denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
State v. Marquez
...exist that otherwise emphasize the defendant's photograph." State v. Owens, 38 Conn.App. 801, 811, 663 A.2d 1094, cert. denied, 235 Conn. 912, 665 A.2d 609 (1995). In the present case, Clement testified at the suppression hearing that he remembered that Detective Beaudin had read him the wa......
-
State v. Reid
...suggestive but admitted under totality of circumstances); State v. Owens, 38 Conn. App. 801, 811, 663 A.2d 1094, cert. denied, 235 Conn. 912, 665 A.2d 609 (1995) ("[e]ven if a court finds that the police expressly informed witnesses that the defendant would be in the array, our courts have ......
-
State v. Bell
...exist that otherwise emphasize the defendant's photograph." State v. Owens, 38 Conn.App. 801, 811, 663 A.2d 1094, cert. denied, 235 Conn. 912, 665 A.2d 609 (1995). No other factors existed in this case to make the array unnecessarily suggestive. Our case law is clear that a photographic arr......
-
State v. Mills
...clearly erroneous." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Owens, 38 Conn. App. 801, 804, 663 A.2d 1094, cert. denied, 235 Conn. 912, 665 A.2d 609 (1995). "In determining whether identification procedures violate a defendant's due process rights, [t]he required inquiry is made on an a......
Request a trial to view additional results