State v. Paint Rock Coal & Coke Co.

Decision Date19 November 1892
CitationState v. Paint Rock Coal & Coke Co., 20 S.W. 499, 36 Am. St. Rep. 68, 92 Tenn. 81 (Tenn. 1892)
PartiesSTATE v. PAINT ROCK COAL & COKE CO.
CourtTennessee Supreme Court

Appeal from circuit court, Scott county; S. A. ROGERS, Judge.

The Paint Rock Coal & Coke Company was indicted for refusing to cash a certain check of its own presented within 30 days after being issued.Defendant's motion to quash the indictment was sustained.The state appeals.Affirmed.

G. W. Pickle, Atty. Gen., for the State.Washburn & Templeton, for appellee.

HENDERSON, Special Judge.

At the July term, 1891, the grand jurors for Scott county returned an indictment against the Paint Rock Coal & Coke Company consisting of two counts, in substance as follows: (1) That the said defendant refused "to cash a certain check of its own that was presented it within thirty days of its date of issuance."(2) That the said defendant"did unlawfully refuse to redeem, in lawful currency, a certain check of its own, which said Paint Rock Coal & Coke Company had issued."To this indictment the defendant interposed a motion to quash, and set forth the following grounds: "(1) Because no criminal offense is alleged in the indictment.(2) Because the act of 1887, under which this indictment was drawn, is unconstitutional, in that it impairs the obligation of the contract, and attempts to imprison the defendant for refusing to pay a debt."On the hearing of the question thus presented, his honor, the circuit judge, sustained said motion, and quashed said indictment.The state appeals to this court.

Passing over the objection to the form of the indictment, which contains no identification or description of the check complained of, the law of the case is invoked in the second ground of the motion to quash.The act of March 29, 1887, enacts that from and after the passage of that act it would be unlawful for any person or persons, firms or corporations or companies, to...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
11 cases
  • Goolsby v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • May 5, 1925
    ... ... Tennessee. State v. Paint Rock Coal & Coke Co., 92 Tenn ... 81 [20 S.W. 499], 36 Am.St.Rep. 68 ... ...
  • Goolsby v. State
    • United States
    • Alabama Court of Appeals
    • May 19, 1925
    ... ... Tennessee. State v. Paint Rock Coal & Coke Co., 92 Tenn ... 81 [20 S.W. 499], 36 Am.St.Rep. 68 ... ...
  • Fears v. Riley
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 8, 1898
    ...in this state relating to change of venue statutes, which is itself of persuasive force (Venable v. Railroad Co., 112 Mo., loc. cit. 125, 20 S. W. 499, and cases therein cited); and it was so opposed to the wishes and intentions of the people of the state that the legislature, by statutory ......
  • Venable v. the Wabash Western Railway Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • November 14, 1893
    ... ... land owned by him in the county of Chariton, in said state, ... the same being situated in sections 10, 11, 14 and ... 663; ... Packard v. Richardson, 17 Mass. 143. Coke upon ... Littleton, 31b; Park on Dower, 121; 1 Scribner on ... enterprise." Coal" Co. v. Coal & Iron Co. , 37 ... Md. loc. cit. 562 ... \xC2" ... ...
  • Get Started for Free