State v. Parker
| Decision Date | 30 June 1876 |
| Citation | 75 N.C. 249,22 Am.Rep. 669 |
| Parties | STATE v. W. R. PARKER. |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Men may not be arrested, imprisoned and released upon the judgment, or at the discretion of a Constable, or any one else: Therefore, where a Town Constable arrested a person who was intoxicated, without warrant, and imprisoned him in the “lock-up” until he became sober, when the Constable released him, having never carried him before a Magistrate or other person to have the charge investigated, he, the Constable, was guilty of an Assault and Battery.
( Commissioners of Washington v. Frank, 1 Jones, 446, cited and approved.)
This was an INDICTMENT for an Assault and Battery, tried before his Honor, Judge MOORE, at the Spring Term, 1876, of the Superior Court of PITT County.
On the trial below, the jury returned the following special verdict, to-wit:
(1.) That the defendant did arrest the prosecutor, Robert Starkey, and against his consent put him in the “lock-up,” at Marlboro', and released him as soon as he became sober.
(2.) That the defendant was Town Constable for the village of Marlboro', and arrested and imprisoned Robert Starkey as he thought in discharge of his official duty, as he so declared at the time, though he had no kind of process upon which to make the arrest.
(3.) That Starkey at the time arrested and imprisoned, was intoxicated on or near the public streets of Marlboro', in full view of the citizens thereof, though at the time he was saying nothing and using no profane or vulgar language.
(4.) That the town of Marlboro' was incorporated, and the Commissioners had passed the following ordinance, which was in force at the time of the alleged assault:
“Any person found in a state of intoxication, or using vulgar or profane language, is declared a nuisance, and shall incur a penalty not to exceed ten dollars for each offence.”
Upon this special verdict his Honor adjudged the defendant not guilty, and discharged him.
From this judgment the Solicitor for the State appealed.
Attorney General Hargrove, for the State .
Defendant had no counsel in this Court.
Admitting that the ordinance in question is a valid one, it no where confers, and it could not constitutionally confer upon a constable, a ministerial officer, the power to arrest and imprison for a penalty incurred or for any other violation of law, except it may be for safe custody. Men may not be arrested, imprisoned and released upon the judgment or at the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Abernethy
... ... by statute, but it is also permissible, in the absence of an ... enactment controlling the matter, for the maker either to ... sign the instrument by affixing his own signature or to adopt ... a signature written for him by another. Lee v ... Parker, 171 N.C. 144, 88 S.E. 217. Here it may be ... assumed that the mayor authorized and adopted the signing of ... his name by the notary public, for he swore to it and caused ... the certificate, in its present form, to be placed with the ... papers in the case in compliance with the statute ... ...
-
Keefe v. Hart
... ... Barber, 18 R.I. 459, 28 A. 805; Pratt v. Hill, ... 16 Barb. (N. Y.) 303; ... [213 Mass. 482] ... Green v. Kennedy, 46 Barb. (N. Y.) 16; State v ... Parker, 75 N.C. 249, 22 Am. Rep. 669; Manning v ... Mitchell, 73 Ga. 660, 663; Judson v. Reardon, ... 16 Minn. 431 (Gil. 387); Newby v ... ...
-
Board of School Directors of Buncombe County v. City of Asheville
... ... the city of Asheville. From a judgment for plaintiff, ... defendant appeals. Affirmed ... Davidson, ... Bourne & Parker", for appellant ... Locke ... Craig and J. D. Murphy, for appellee ... [50 S.E. 280] ... CONNER, ... \xC2" ... such judgment as, in our opinion, is in accordance with the ... Constitution and laws of the state. We also concur in the ... opinion that, when the question has been considered and ... decided, the court will not reverse its former decision ... ...
-
Ex parte Harvell
...bail as may be legally required of him. ' Hanson, Judge, in United States v. Almeida, 2 Wheeler, Cr. Cas. N.Y. 576. In State v. Parker, 75 N.C. 249, 22 Am.Rep. 669, Justice Bynum, holding that a constable, who arrested, imprisoned, and discharged, without a warrant, a man found intoxicated ......