State v. Paul, 35005
Decision Date | 26 March 1959 |
Docket Number | No. 35005,35005 |
Parties | STATE of Washington, Plalntiff and Relator, v. Janice PAUL, Defendant. Superior Court for Snohomish County, Charles R. Denney, Judge, Respondent. |
Court | Washington Supreme Court |
Arnold R. Zempel, R. C. Jefferson, Everett, John J. O'Connell, Mitchell Doumit, E. P. Donnelly, Olympia, for relator.
Newell Smith, Everett, for respondent.
Charles P. Moriarty, U. S. Atty., Richard F. Broz, Seattle, Raymond C. Coulter, Regional Sol., Leon Jourolmon, Jr., Asst. Regional Sol., Interior Dept., Portland, Or. amici curiae.
Janice Paul, an Indian, is a member of the Skagit tribe and resides on the Tulalip Indian reservation in Snohomish county. She is subject by treaty to the jurisdiction of the Tulalip Indian Corporation.
By information, Janice Paul was charged with the crime of second degree assault. The acts which are alleged to have constituted the assault occurred on the Tulalip reservation, and the person alleged to have been assaulted is an Indian.
A motion for dismissal of the action was filed after the arraignment of Janice Paul. It urged that the superior court for Snohomish county had no jurisdiction of the person of the defendant or the subject matter of the action. In disposing of the matter, the trial judge ordered the cause dismissed, with prejudice, on the ground of lack of jurisdiction, holding chapter 240, Laws of 1957, p. 941, to be unconstitutional. This created an emergent situation respecting law enforcement, peace and order in certain localities adjacent to or embracing Indian reservations in the state of Washington. Consequently, this court granted the state's petition for certiorari.
The constitutionality of chapter 240 supra, should be considered in the light of several constitutional provisions and in relation to certain legislative enactments leading up to the passage of chapter 240, supra.
It was in 1889 that the Congress of the United States admitted the states of Washington, North Dakota, South Dakota and Montana into the Union; Act Feb. 22, 1889, 25 Stat. 676. The enabling act provided, inter alia, for a constitutional convention in the state of Washington. It further provided:
'* * * And said conventions shall provide, by ordinances irrevocable without the consent of the United States and the people of said States:
* * *
* * *
* * *'(Emphasis supplied).
In compliance with the enabling act, Art. XXVI of the Washington state constitution provided as follows:
'Compact With The United States
'The following ordinance shall be irrevocable without the consent of the United States and the people of this state:
* * *
* * *
(Emphasis supplied).
In 1953, Congress enacted Public Law 280 (Act Aug. 15, 1953, 67 Stat. 588, 590), consenting to the assumption of jurisdiction over Indians by the states. The pertinent sections of Public Law 280, supra, provide:
28 U.S.C.A. § 1360 note.
Supplementing Congressional enactment of Public Law 280, supra, our legislature enacted chapter 240, Laws of 1957. The following portion of chapter 240 is significant:
Inter alia, chapter 240, supra, provides that the state of Washington shall not assume jurisdiction over an Indian tribe in this state until such tribe expresses a desire for its people to be subject to the jurisdiction of the state of Washington. The procedure is specified. A tribe may petition the governor of the state. The governor then may issue a...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Washington v. Confederated Bands and Tribes of Yakima Indian Nation
... 439 U.S. 463 ... 99 S.Ct. 740 ... 58 L.Ed.2d 740 ... State of WASHINGTON et al., Appellants, ... CONFEDERATED BANDS AND TRIBES OF the YAKIMA INDIAN NATION ... 280. State v. Paul , 53 Wash.2d 789, 337 P.2d 35. The Washington Supreme Court rejected the argument, construing the ... ...
-
State v. Shale
... ... State v. Paul, 53 Wash.2d 789, 79091, 337 P.2d 33 (1959) (emphasis omitted) (quoting Enabling Act, ch. 180, 25 Stat. 676 (1889)). However, Washington State did ... ...
-
Anderson v. Gladden
... 188 F. Supp. 666 ... James Quinten ANDERSON, Petitioner, ... C. T. GLADDEN, Warden, Oregon State Penitentiary, Respondent ... Civ. No. 60-33 ... United States District Court D. Oregon ... Supp. 677 Public Law 280. Likewise, the Washington cases, State v. Paul, 53 Wash.2d 789, 337 P.2d 33; Wesley v. Schneckloth, Wash., 346 P.2d 658; Application of Monroe, ... ...
-
State v. Marek, 16178
... ... See also State ex. rel. McDonald v. District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, 159 Mont. 56, 496 P.2d 78 (1972); State v. Paul, 53 Wash.2d 789, 337 P.2d 33 (1959) ... Marek next asserts that the language of I.C. § 67-5101 C, "logically refers only to the ... ...
-
Negotiating Jurisdiction: Retroceding State Authority Over Indian Country Granted by Public Law 280
...Wash. Sess. Laws 941, ch. 240. See infra note 178 for the seven tribes that achieved partial state jurisdiction. 131. 53 Wash. 2d 789, 337 P.2d 33 132. The state's enabling act provided:That the people inhabiting said proposed States do agree and declare that they forever disclaim all right......
-
When the Bough Breaks: Federal and Washington State Indian Child Welfare Law and Its Application
...See H.R. Rep. No. 848, 83rd Cong., 1st Sess. 5 (1953), reprinted in 1953 U.S.C.C.A.N. 2408, 2412. 174. State v. Paul, 53 Wash. 2d 789, 337 P.2d 33, appeal dismissed, 361 U.S. 898 (1959). 175. Id. at 793, 337 P.2d at 36. 176. State Enabling Act of 1889, ch. 180, § 1, 25 Stat. 676, 676. 177. ......