State v. Perry
Decision Date | 25 January 1988 |
Docket Number | No. 22832,22832 |
Citation | 364 S.E.2d 201,294 S.C. 311 |
Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | The STATE, Respondent, v. Ramon P. PERRY, Appellant. |
Asst. Appellate Defender Joseph L. Savitz, III, Columbia, for appellant.
Atty. Gen., T. Travis Medlock, Asst. Attys. Gen., Harold M. Coombs, Jr., and Norman Mark Rapoport, and Sol. James C. Anders, Columbia, for respondent.
Appellant was convicted of armed robbery and sentenced to twenty years imprisonment. We affirm.
Appellant argues the trial judge erroneously allowed his impeachment with a prior conviction for malicious destruction of personal property. A prior conviction may be used to impeach a witness's credibility only if the conviction involves a crime of moral turpitude. State v. Drakeford, 290 S.C. 338, 350 S.E.2d 391 (1986). A crime involving moral turpitude is an act of baseness, vileness, or depravity in the private and social duties which man owes to his fellow man or to society in general, contrary to the customary and accepted rule of right and duty between man and man. State v. Ball, 292 S.C. 71, 354 S.E.2d 906 (1987); State v. Morris, 289 S.C. 294, 345 S.E.2d 477 (1986).
Malicious destruction of personal property involves the wilful, unlawful, and malicious destruction of the personal property of another. S.C.Code Ann. § 16-11-510 (1985). We hold it is a crime of moral turpitude. See State v. Yates, 280 S.C. 29, 310 S.E.2d 805 (1982) ( ). The trial judge properly allowed appellant's impeachment with this prior conviction.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mitchell v. State, 23004
...his credibility, it is firmly established that the conviction must relate to a crime involving moral turpitude. State v. Perry, 294 S.C. 311, 364 S.E.2d 201 (1988); State v. Morris, 289 S.C. 294, 345 S.E.2d 477 The crime of first degree manslaughter in New York has the same elements as volu......
- Johnson v. State