State v. Petro

Decision Date26 November 1947
Docket Number31098.
Citation76 N.E.2d 370,148 Ohio St. 505
PartiesSTATE v. PETRO.
CourtOhio Supreme Court

Syllabus by the Court.

To warrant the granting of a motion for a new trial in a criminal case, based on the ground of newly discovered evidence, it must be shown that the new evidence (1) discloses a strong probability that it will change the result if a new trial is granted, (2) has been discovered since the trial, (3) is such as could not in the exercise of due diligence have been discovered before the trial, (4) is material to the issues, (5) is not merely cumulative to former evidence, and (6) does not merely impeach or contradict the former evidence. (State v. Lopa, 96 Ohio St. 410, 117 N.E. 319, approved and followed.)

Appeal from Court of Appeals, for Cuyahoga County.

Edward C. Stanton and M. A. Picciano, both of Cleveland, for appellant.

Frank T. Cullitan, Pros. Atty., and Victor DeMarco, both of Cleveland, for appellee.

TURNER Judge.

This is a separate appeal growing out of State v. Petro, Ohio Sup., 76 N.E.2d 355.

Appellant assigns as error the affirming of the judgment of the trial court in overruling defendant's motion for new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence, material to the defendant, and which he could not with reasonable diligence have ascertained and produced at the trial.

The motion reads:

'Now comes Julius Anthony Petro, defendant in the foregoing matter, and moves this honorable court for an order vacating and setting aside the verdict of the jury in this cause rendered on the 18th day of June, 1946, and granting a new trial herein, for the following reasons, to wit:

'Newly discovered evidence material to the defendant, which he could not with reasonable diligence have discovered and produced at the trial.

'In support of this motion, and pursuant to Section 13449-1 General Code, defendant files herewith the affidavit of the witness by whom such evidence is expected to be given.

'The affidavit reads as follows:

'Thomas Whalen, being first duly sworn according to law deposes and says that on the 2nd day of March, 1946, he was a duly qualified, appointed and acting member of the Cleveland Police Department, assigned to the homicide squad.
'Affiant further deposes and says that in company with other members of the Cleveland Police Department, he investigated the homicide of one Robert Knaus, whose body was found on Belvoir boulevard on the afternoon of said day.
'Affiant further says that he, in his capacity as a police officer of the city of Cleveland, was present at the morgue of said Cuyahoga county, Ohio, at 8 p. m. on March 2nd, 1946, when the body of Robert Knaus was examined by Samuel R. Gerber, coroner of Cuyahoga county, Ohio; that at the conclusion of said examination the said Samuel R. Gerber, coroner of Cuyahoga county, Ohio, stated in the presence and hearing of this affiant that the body had been dead approximately 60 hours prior to said examination at 8 p. m., and that in conformance with the rules and regulations of the police department, affiant made a written report pertaining to said investigation, including therein a reference to what transpired at the county morgue at 8 p. m.; that said report consisted of an original and three carbon copies in each of which this affiant reported therein the following:
"Dr. Gerber, county coroner, examined the body of the victim and informed us that death had been approximately 60 hours previous to his examination at 8 p. m., March 2nd. He will give further details later.'
'Further affiant saith not.
'(Signed) Thomas Whalen.'

The law on this subject is set forth in the per curiam opinion in the case of State v. Lopa, 96 Ohio St. 410, at page 411, 117 N.E. 319, 320, where it is said: 'The granting of a motion for a new trial upon the ground named [newly discovered evidence] is necessarily committed to the wise discretion of the court, and a court...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • State v. Hale
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • 26 Octubre 2023
    ...33. 22 Whether Hale's newly discovered evidence satisfies the remaining elements of the standards set forth in Brady and State v. Petro, 148 Ohio St. 505, 76 N.E.2d 370 (1947), syllabus, including whether the suppressed evidence is material, remains for the trial court to decide when adjudi......
  • State v. Hale
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • 26 Octubre 2023
    ... ... discovering the evidence on which he seeks to base his ... motion." Hatton, 169 Ohio St.3d 446, ... 2022-Ohio-3991, 205 N.E.3d 513, at ¶ 33 ... Whether Hale's newly discovered evidence satisfies the ... remaining elements of the standards set forth in ... Brady and State v. Petro, 148 Ohio St. 505, ... 76 N.E.2d 370 (1947), syllabus, including whether the ... suppressed evidence is material, remains for the trial court ... to decide when adjudicating the motion for a new trial ... itself. Thus, we express no opinion on whether Hale should ... ultimately prevail on the ... ...
  • State v. Houston
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • 26 Octubre 2023
    ... ... material to the issues, (5) is not merely cumulative to ... former evidence, and (6) does not merely impeach or ... contradict the former evidence." ... State v. Gilbert, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 106358, ... 2018-Ohio-3789, ¶ 24, quoting State v. Petro, ... 148 Ohio St. 505, 76 N.E.2d 370 (1947), syllabus ...          {¶ ... 14} A motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence ... must be filed within 120 days after a verdict is rendered ... Crim.R. 33(B). A defendant who fails to file a motion for new ... trial within ... ...
  • State v. Ojile
    • United States
    • Ohio Court of Appeals
    • 29 Noviembre 2023
    ...evidence. State v. Petro, 148 Ohio St. 505, 76 N.E.2d 370 (1947), syllabus. {¶31} In this appeal, the parties focus on the first and sixth Petro factors, and no one explicitly contests the other Petro factors had been satisfied, including that the new evidence was material to the issues at ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT