State v. Pettigrew

Decision Date08 December 2010
CitationState v. Pettigrew, 299 Conn. 916, 10 A.3d 1052 (Conn. 2010)
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
PartiesSTATE of Connecticut v. Corey PETTIGREW.

Pamela S. Nagy, special public defender, in support of the petition.

Toni M. Smith-Rosario, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 124 Conn.App. 9, 3 A.3d 148 (2010), is denied.

EVELEIGH, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • State v. Hearl
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • May 29, 2018
    ...understanding." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Pettigrew , 124 Conn. App. 9, 24–25, 3 A.3d 148, cert. denied, 299 Conn. 916, 10 A.3d 1052 (2010).As stated previously, § 53–247 (a) provides in relevant part: "Any person ... who, having impounded or confined any animal, fails to......
  • State v. East
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • January 20, 2015
    ...demeanor and attitude." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Pettigrew, 124 Conn. App. 9, 31, 3 A.3d 148, cert. denied, 299 Conn. 916, 10 A.3d 1052 (2010). Finally, we note that in "reaching its conclusions, a jury may draw reasonable and logical inferences from the facts proven, bu......
  • State Of Conn. v. Douglas
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • January 25, 2011
    ... ... Intent may be and usually is inferred from conduct ... [W]hether such an inference should be drawn is properly a question for the jury to decide.'' (Internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Pettigrew, 124 Conn. App. 9, 32, 3 A.3d 148, cert. denied, 299 Conn. 916, A.3d (2010). ''[T]he defendant's state of mind may Page 9 be proven by his conduct before, during and after the shooting.'' State v. Williams, 94 Conn. App. 424, 433, 892 A.2d 990, cert. denied, 279 Conn. 901, 901 ... ...
  • State v. Dojnia
    • United States
    • Connecticut Court of Appeals
    • June 4, 2019
    ...amendment to the United States constitution; see, e.g., State v. Pettigrew , 124 Conn. App. 9, 24–25, 3 A.3d 148, cert. denied, 299 Conn. 916, 10 A.3d 1052 (2010) ; the claim is of constitutional magnitude. Having determined that the claim is reviewable under Golding , we turn to its merits......
  • Get Started for Free