State v. Phipps

Decision Date31 August 1848
Citation10 Ired. 17,32 N.C. 17
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesTHE STATE v. ELIJAH PHIPPS.
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

At the common law no trespass on chattels was an indictable offence without a breach of the peace; that is, either the peace must be actually broken, or the act complained of must directly and manifestly tend to it, as being done in the presence of the owner, to his terror or against his will.

The case of the State v?? Flowers, 2 Mur 225, cited and approved.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Ashe County, at the Fall Term 1847, his Honor Judge PEARSON presiding.

The indictment is for a forcible trespass in killing a dog, the property of James Perry. The jury returned a special verdict, which is as follows: The jury find, that, on the 10th day of March 1847, near the dwelling house of James Perry, in the county of Ashe, Lugena Ann Perry and Franky L. Perry were in the possession of a dog; that the defendant was approaching the house, when the dog rushed at him and attempted to bite him: that with much difficulty he kept the dog off, by means of his gun: that Lugena and Franky L. Perry, who were a short distance from the dog, but not in sight, the view being obstructed by the corner of the house, hearing the dog bark, immediately came round, and with a stick drove the dog away; that, as the dog was retiring, and at the distance of about seven steps, the defendant fired and killed him in their presence. The jury find that the defendant was on good terms with the said Perry, the said Lugena and Franky L. Perry, and came to the house of Perry on a friendly visit, and at no time, either before, during or after the rencounter with the dog, manifested any ill feeling towards the said Lugena and Franky Perry, or attempted in any way to intimidate or alarm them; that he carried his rifle, with which he shot the dog, as is the custom in that County, for the purpose of killing such game, as he might meet with in passing through the mountains: that the said Lugena and Franky L. Perry, one of whom was about thirteen end the other about eleven years of age, were much excited and alarmed by the scuffle with the dog and the explosion of the gun: that the dog was killed against their will, he being a great favorite in the family, but he was fierce and in the habit of attacking stangers, both abroad and at home, and only to be kept off by a blow with a weapon or the call of his master: that Perry and his wife were both out in the field at...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • State v. Baker
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 23 Noviembre 1949
    ...criminal trespasses to land and fixtures are known to the law. Some are common law crimes, and others are legislative creations. State v. Phipps, 32 N.C. 17; State Love, 19 N.C. 267; State v. Flowers, 6 N.C. 225; State v. Trexler, 4 N.C. 188, 6 Am.Dec. 558; G.S.Ch. 14, art. 22. They fall in......
  • Corpening v. Grinnell
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 31 Agosto 1849

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT