State v. Pollman
Decision Date | 18 November 1908 |
Citation | 51 Wash. 110,98 P. 88 |
Court | Washington Supreme Court |
Parties | STATE v. POLLMAN. |
Appeal from Superior Court, Whatcom County; Jeremiah Neterer, Judge.
B. C Pollman was convicted of practicing medicine without a license, and appeals. Affirmed.
Fairchild & Bruce, for appellant.
Virgil Peringer, George Livesey, and Newman & Howard, for the State.
The appellant, Pollman, was informed against for the crime of practicing medicine without a license; the information omitting its title and verification, being as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Smith v. People
... ... Chapter 127, Rev. Stats. 1908, regulating the practice of ... medicine, is for the protection of the public health. It ... creates a state board of medical examiners, requires all ... persons desirous of practicing medicine within the state to ... obtain a license from the board, makes ... State v. Bresee, 137 Iowa 673, 114 N.W. 45, 24 L.R.A. (N. S.) ... 103; State v. Heffernan, 28 R.I. 20, 65 A. 284; State v ... Pollman, 51 Wash. 110, 98 P. 88 ... 3. The ... state has the right to determine and define what constitutes ... the practice of medicine. State ... ...
-
Locke v. Ionia
...32 South. 767,58 L. R. A. 925 (osteopathy); Little v. State, 60 Neb. 749, 84 N. W. 248,51 L. R. A. 717 (osteopathy); State v. Pollman, 51 Wash. 110, 98 Pac. 88 (osteopathic and magnetic); People v. Gordon, 194 Ill. 560, 62 N. E. 858,88 Am. St. Rep. 165 (magnetic healing in the nature of ost......
-
Waldo v. Poe
...as denying to the plaintiff the qualification for registration (a copy of the opinion is attached to the answer). He cites State v. Pollman, 51 Wash. 110, 98 P. 88; Lathrop v. Sundberg, 62 Wash. 136, 33 L. R. A. (N. S.) 90, Ann. Cas. 1912C, 891, as excluding, by analogy at least, the plaint......
- Fairhaven Pub. Co. v. City of Bellingham