State v. Priddy
| Decision Date | 05 October 1994 |
| Docket Number | No. 407P94,407P94 |
| Citation | 337 N.C. 805,449 S.E.2d 751 |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE of North Carolina v. Patricia Diane BAKER, Langston Priddy |
Rudolph A. Ashton, III, New Bern, for Baker and Priddy.
Robert T. Hargett, Associate Atty. Gen., William David McFadyen, Jr., Dist. Atty., for State.
Prior report: 115 N.C.App. 547, 445 S.E.2d 610.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 5th day of October 1994."
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
State v. Haith
...driving while impaired is a substantive offense, State v. Priddy, 115 N.C. App. 547, 445 S.E.2d 610, disc. review denied, 337 N.C. 805, 449 S.E.2d 751 (1994), as well as a punishment, or recidivist, offense. State v. Vardiman, 146 N.C. App. 381, 385, 552 S.E.2d 697, 700 (2001), cert. denied......
-
State v. McCully, No. COA05-1080 (NC 5/16/2006)
... ... § 20-138.5 constitutes a separate substantive felony offense which is properly within the original exclusive jurisdiction of the superior court." State v. Priddy, 115 N.C. App. 547, 548, 445 S.E.2d 610, 612, disc. review denied, 337 N.C. 805, 449 S.E.2d 751 (1994). An essential element of habitual impaired driving is a defendant's three or more prior convictions involving impaired driving. State v. Burch, 160 N.C. App. 394, 396, 585 S.E.2d 461, 463 (2003) ... ...